RMF Spreadsheet Reporter from z/OS 2.4

Attempting to create a working set, and I get the error messages below. I cannot find the error messages in the RMF Messages manual, under the top of RMF Spreadsheet Reporter. Anyone have ideas? RMF Spreadsheet Reporter V5.4.41 z/OS Copyright (c) 1994-2020, IBM Corporation - all rights reserved

Re: IZUSVR1 startup for z/OS 2.4

you 'SHOULD' be able to find the error message on IBMLINK, I say should, that's been my biggest issues so far, these messages provide no help, that said, in z/OS 2.4 you should not be using /var/zosmf/ the data file 'customer config' is now in the /global/zosmf/ dir, ma

IZUSVR1 startup for z/OS 2.4

I am in the process of rolling out z/OS 2.4 at my new employer. I inherited my predecessor's Serverpac install of z/OS 2.4. I pulled down, and applied the z/OS 2.4 cumulative maintenance (first week of June). The initial IPL's have all been successful. Yesterday, I noticed the follo

Re: Apache webserver that was required as of z/OS 2.4

gt; Subject: Re: Apache webserver that was required as of z/OS 2.4 > > Not 100% sure, but you may try lowing ServerLimit. The default is to start 1 > and max (ServerLimit) is default to 18. > > -- > For IBM-

Re: Apache webserver that was required as of z/OS 2.4

Not 100% sure, but you may try lowing ServerLimit. The default is to start 1 and max (ServerLimit) is default to 18. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with

Apache webserver that was required as of z/OS 2.4

I converted to this version because I had to. Our need for this function is very limited, and we are still getting smaller. As mentioned before, I am actively reducing our use of z/OS and the resources associated with it. This new webserver consumes CPU when there is no actual activity. And

Re: Catch-22 on z/OSMF under z/OS 2.4

Tnanks for the research. It is a perfect match to what happened. I have just finished our first wave of RSU*, SECINT, and SMCCOR PTFs (224 in total). It had the correcting Java level. I then jumped the queue and applied it to our running test system. It resolved our problem as expected.

Re: Catch-22 on z/OSMF under z/OS 2.4

> It was our Second ServerPac order (in late August). Our first order > did not build a product correctly in our June order. > > Here is the order info from our currently installed ServerPac > (customer name redacted) > > U02298367 - Products - 2021-08-26 14.30.31 > Customer number: S#

Re: Catch-22 on z/OSMF under z/OS 2.4

In my frustration - I misspoke. It was a ServerPac order. It was our Second ServerPac order (in late August). Our first order did not build a product correctly in our June order. Here is the order info from our currently installed ServerPac (customer name redacted) U02298367 - Products - 2

Re: Catch-22 on z/OSMF under z/OS 2.4

> The solution has been found. > It turns out that the java level that comes with a CBPDO does not > correctly support z/OSMF requirements. > z/OSMF required Java 8.0.35/36 not the delivered 8.0.32. I want to follow-up on this with the appropriate folks, but just to be sure we're talking ab

Re: Catch-22 on z/OSMF under z/OS 2.4

The solution has been found. It turns out that the java level that comes with a CBPDO does not correctly support z/OSMF requirements. How nice. I always thought that a CBPDO was a 'working' system, not just untested parts thrown into a download bucket. This is my second problem with z/OS 'L

Re: Catch-22 on z/OSMF under z/OS 2.4

Tom, You can avoid conflicts between Infoprint Server up and other requirements. See Customizing the IBM HTTP Server - Powered by Apache - IBM Documentation https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=

Re: Catch-22 on z/OSMF under z/OS 2.4

late to the game here, we were forced to move to TLS 1.2, once we did z/osmf services, notifications services stopped working, specifically JES2EDS, to fix this we had to add an LE parm I'm not sure this would help in you case but it may be worth a try. ENVAR("GSK_PROTOCOL_TLSV1_2=ON") and add

Re: Catch-22 on z/OSMF under z/OS 2.4

>You might have a look at this also: >https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6518654 >It basically a timing issue with the start of Pagent and z/OSMF using AT-TLS. Sadly, that is not my problem - No Java.IO exception. And PAGENT is up and working. I have recycled the zOSMF tasks several time

Re: Catch-22 on z/OSMF under z/OS 2.4

You might have a look at this also: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6518654 It basically a timing issue with the start of Pagent and z/OSMF using AT-TLS. David Follis -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access i

Re: Catch-22 on z/OSMF under z/OS 2.4

On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:36:08 -0600, Tom Longfellow wrote: >I needed to vent so here goes. > >Health checker says AT-TLS needs updating for GPMSERV/DDS >Infoprint server now requres https support not configured in our AT-TLS config. >Plus we want to convert to AT-TLS support for TN3270 port 23. >

Catch-22 on z/OSMF under z/OS 2.4

I needed to vent so here goes. Health checker says AT-TLS needs updating for GPMSERV/DDS Infoprint server now requres https support not configured in our AT-TLS config. Plus we want to convert to AT-TLS support for TN3270 port 23. z/OSMF comes up and 'says' web services are running.. Attempts to

Re: SQA shortage after z/OS 2.4 [EXTERNAL]

asing. Thanks..   Paul Feller GTS Mainframe Technical Support -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 12:46 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: SQA shortage after z/OS 2.4 [EXTERNAL] Hello Recently we upgraded our z

Re: SQA shortage after z/OS 2.4

Classification: Confidential RMF III option 3.10 (common storage allocatation will show you what the system has done. You did not say if this was above/below the line. There are remediations for both. If I had to guess, I would think something in the z/OS 2.4 installation pushed SQA/ESQA

Re: SQA shortage after z/OS 2.4

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Sent: 01 December 2021 06:46 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: SQA shortage after z/OS 2.4 EXTERNAL EMAIL Hello Recently we upgraded our z/OS to 2.4 from 2.2. Post that we had an outage due to SQA shortage (s878). The SQA value we h

Re: SQA shortage after z/OS 2.4

SMF 78-2 RMF Virtual Storage Activity data / report is what I'd use. But I note it might not be that helpful with spikes. https://mainframeperformancetopics.com/2020/01/05/how-i-look-at-virtual-storage/ is more relevant than https://mainframeperformancetopics.com/2021/07/21/time-for-action-on-

SQA shortage after z/OS 2.4

Hello Recently we upgraded our z/OS to 2.4 from 2.2. Post that we had an outage due to SQA shortage (s878). The SQA value we have set is 5,80. Is there any benchmark or any way to analyse to understand on what would the Apt or a value which satisfies the overall operating system usage ? Peter -

Re: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error

in log , just that from SYSLOG I am unable to > respond to that WTOR but whereas I can reply to the same WTOR from the > master console. This started happening after z/OS 2.4 upgrade. > > All the SDSF related security are handled via ISFPRMxx, we still have not > migrated to RACF securit

Re: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error

y for operator commands XA TSOAUTH = OPER XA TSOAUTH = CONSOLE -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jake Anderson Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 8:35 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error CAUTION: This

Re: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error

There were no ICH message in log , just that from SYSLOG I am unable to respond to that WTOR but whereas I can reply to the same WTOR from the master console. This started happening after z/OS 2.4 upgrade. All the SDSF related security are handled via ISFPRMxx, we still have not migrated to RACF

Re: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error

Do you have the proper security for operator commands XA TSOAUTH = OPER XA TSOAUTH = CONSOLE -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jake Anderson Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 8:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Console

Re: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error

Classification: Confidential Console=distributed in IEASYS00? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jake Anderson Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 3:19 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error [CAUTION: This

Re: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error

, 2021 8:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error This is not from console instead it is from TSO syslog from where we issue console commands with / On Thu, 25 Nov, 2021, 4:30 pm Seymour J Metz, wrote: > Check the routing for that console. W

Re: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error

on.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf > of Jake Anderson [justmainfra...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 4:19 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: z/OS 2.4 Cons

Re: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error

, November 25, 2021 4:19 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error Hello Recently I upgraded the z/OS 2.2 to 2.4 Post that I am receiving the below message while I am trying to initialise a dasd volume using ICKDSF, Though the number 38 shows as the WTOR in

z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error

Hello Recently I upgraded the z/OS 2.2 to 2.4 Post that I am receiving the below message while I am trying to initialise a dasd volume using ICKDSF, Though the number 38 shows as the WTOR in Job log to initialise but if I get R 38,U it doesn't take it. RESPONSE= IEE703I REPLY 38 NOT REQUESTED

Re: z/OS 2.5 and RMF - plus the migration manual from z/OS 2.4.

Thanks for the information on RMF and it was there in the doc and delivered parmlib, I simply over looked it. And thank you Marna for the link to the migration process exported from z/OSMF, and yes, after I get z/OS 2.5 up and running I will be converted to using z/OSMF. Regards, Claude Richb

Re: z/OS 2.5 and RMF - plus the migration manual from z/OS 2.4.

MFMFC is not in the SYS1.SERBLNKE library that came with z/OS >2.5. >I went looking for it and found it in the z/OS 2.4 library - SYS1.SERBLINK. >Now, in z/OS 2.5 there is no SYS1.SERBLPA and SYS1.SERBLINK libraries any >more, only the SYS1.SERBLNKE file. What have I missed here and where is

Re: z/OS 2.5 and RMF - plus the migration manual from z/OS 2.4.

manual from z/OS 2.4. Good afternoon everyone, Two things that I noticed with z/OS 2.5 so far and I have a couple of questions for the group. Q1: RMF would not start after the first IPL of z/OS 2.5. The program ERBMFMFC is not in the SYS1.SERBLNKE library that came with z/OS 2.5. I went looking

Re: z/OS 2.5 and RMF - plus the migration manual from z/OS 2.4.

Hello Claude, A1: it is likely that you did not put SGRBLPA in the LPALST. Please see *all* the RMF parmlib, proclib, and security considerations associated with the RMF restructure in z/OS V2.5 in the z/OSMF V2.5 Upgrade Workflow, step called "RMF: Determine updates for RMF structural changes

Re: z/OS 2.5 and RMF - plus the migration manual from z/OS 2.4.

rst IPL of z/OS 2.5. > > The program ERBMFMFC is not in the SYS1.SERBLNKE library that came with z/OS > 2.5. > > I went looking for it and found it in the z/OS 2.4 library - SYS1.SERBLINK. > > Now, in z/OS 2.5 there is no SYS1.SERBLPA and SYS1.SERBLINK libraries any > more, only

z/OS 2.5 and RMF - plus the migration manual from z/OS 2.4.

in the z/OS 2.4 library - SYS1.SERBLINK. Now, in z/OS 2.5 there is no SYS1.SERBLPA and SYS1.SERBLINK libraries any more, only the SYS1.SERBLNKE file. What have I missed here and where is that program now located? RMF is licensed for our site, so everything needed to run it should be here in our z

Re: z/OS 2.4 IPL WSC 040

LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 10/19/2021 06:36 PM > Subject: z/OS 2.4 IPL WSC 040 > Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" > > I recently applied maintenance to our 2.4 system, and got the > following attempting to IPL. > > Central processor (CP) 0 is in a nonrest

Re: z/OS 2.4 IPL WSC 040

Is it a reproducible wait state? Did you take a standalone dump? Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, October 19th, 2021 at 6:30

z/OS 2.4 IPL WSC 040

I recently applied maintenance to our 2.4 system, and got the following attempting to IPL. Central processor (CP) 0 is in a nonrestartable stopped state due to a System Control Program (SCP) initiated reset of the I/O interface for partition BASE. The disabled wait program status word (PSW) is 0

Re: SORTTRAK usage on z/OS 2.4

okay...Let me try that and see how it goes Regards, Robert -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: SORTTRAK usage on z/OS 2.4

s. Try it, you'll like it! Peter -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Hahne Sent: Friday, April 30, 2021 10:37 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SORTTRAK usage on z/OS 2.4 Thanks for your inputs . We are doing this on a test syst

Re: SORTTRAK usage on z/OS 2.4

Thanks for your inputs . We are doing this on a test system at this time and I couldnt find any date /time conversion subroutines over there Could you please provide me a sample of SUDATE , SUTIME and SUYYDDDF which I can use for this purpose ? Regards, Robert

Re: SORTTRAK usage on z/OS 2.4

> IEW2454W 9203 SYMBOL SUDATE UNRESOLVED. NO AUTOCALL (NCAL) > SPECIFIED. > IEW2454W 9203 SYMBOL CONVER08 UNRESOLVED. NO AUTOCALL (NCAL) > SPECIFIED. > IEW2454W 9203 SYMBOL SUYYDDDF UNRESOLVED. NO AUTOCALL (NCAL) > SPECIFIED. > IEW2454W 9203 SYMBOL SUTIME UNRESOLVED. NO AUTOCALL (NCAL) > SPECIF

Re: SORTTRAK usage on z/OS 2.4

Exactly explains the 0C1. Missing subroutines. On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:48:26 -0500 Robert Hahne wrote: :>Greetings , :> :> I downloaded SORTTRAK from CBT tape and compiled it on my 2.4 system to pull out DFSORT usage stats . However , it failed with OC1 reason code 1 :> :>IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP

SORTTRAK usage on z/OS 2.4

Greetings , I downloaded SORTTRAK from CBT tape and compiled it on my 2.4 system to pull out DFSORT usage stats . However , it failed with OC1 reason code 1 IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 670 SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=0C1 REASON CODE=0001 TIME=09.35.45 SE

Re: z/OS 2.4 Install

Yes, create a large enough ZFS to hold the CONTENT and ORDER files, you will need an equal size or better ZFS to use for temporary installation work space later, so you might as well make them both up front. Two 3390-27's is a bit large, but if you have the space, you should use it. You will b

Re: z/OS 2.4 Install

Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 11:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] z/OS 2.4 Install I just received my ServerPac for z/OS 2.4.My current system is z/OS 2.2. I know there is a lot of info about creating a separate ZFS file to hold the DVD images of "CONTENT". An

z/OS 2.4 Install

I just received my ServerPac for z/OS 2.4.My current system is z/OS 2.2. I know there is a lot of info about creating a separate ZFS file to hold the DVD images of "CONTENT". Any advice ? Or gatcha's that people have run into ? I appreciate any information that you

Re: z/OS 2.4 and FTP server with FTP ATTLS verifying client certificates

If the Core FTP LE client is running on your local PC then you will only need a TTLSRule to protect the FTP server. Otherwise you would need two separate rules: one for the server and another for the client. Assuming your FTP client is not running on Z there are two things from the policy that I

Re: [EXTERNAL] z/OS 2.4 and FTP server with FTP ATTLS verifying client certificates

ubject: Re: [EXTERNAL] z/OS 2.4 and FTP server with FTP ATTLS verifying client certificates [External Email. Exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments.] Reply with your PAGENT rules for FTPS - you need a client and a server rule -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussio

Re: [EXTERNAL] z/OS 2.4 and FTP server with FTP ATTLS verifying client certificates

Reply with your PAGENT rules for FTPS - you need a client and a server rule -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of PINION, RICHARD W. Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 10:43 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] z/OS 2.4 and FTP server with FTP

z/OS 2.4 and FTP server with FTP ATTLS verifing client certificates

I've been working with z/OS 2.4's FTP server using AT-TLS with certificates for the last few days. PAGENT is setup, and it seems to be functioning correctly. I've finally gotten to the point of the client sending in a certificate and logging on without having to specify a pas

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

22, 2020 8:03 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question In regards to TYPRUN=COPY not working. In case anybody is interested in this, I received notice yesterday that PTF UJ04073 is now available for this APAR. I haven't installed it yet but it

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:02:53 +, Pommier, Rex wrote: >In regards to TYPRUN=COPY not working. > >In case anybody is interested in this, I received notice yesterday that PTF >UJ04073 is now available for this APAR. I haven't installed it yet but it's >there. > Where I see: Local fix BYPAS

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

mmier, Rex Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question IBM assigned an APAR number on Friday to this. It is APAR OA59800. Thanks, Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier

z/OS 2.4 - Release Space from thin provisioned

Hello, Are there anyone who have installed zOS 2.4 and have exploited the feature of releasing space from thin provisioned volume using DFSMSdss ? Peter -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send ema

RES: NDM 5.2 on z/OS 2.4

NSM 5.2 on z/OS 2.4 We've been trying to get a good answer as to whether or not NDM 5.2 (and 6.0) are compatible with z/OS 2.4. Is anyone running NDM 5.2 on z/OS 2.4? We're working on getting 6.0 installed, but we'd like to know if anyone has seen any is

NDM 5.2 on z/OS 2.4

on z/OS 2.4 We've been trying to get a good answer as to whether or not NDM 5.2 (and 6.0) are compatible with z/OS 2.4. Is anyone running NDM 5.2 on z/OS 2.4? We're working on getting 6.0 installed, but we'd like to know if anyone has seen any issues

NSM 5.2 on z/OS 2.4

We've been trying to get a good answer as to whether or not NDM 5.2 (and 6.0) are compatible with z/OS 2.4. Is anyone running NSM 5.2 on z/OS 2.4? We're working on getting 6.0 installed, but we'd like to know if anyone has seen any issues with

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

Thx for that info... -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

IBM assigned an APAR number on Friday to this. It is APAR OA59800. Thanks, Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:10 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question Not

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

Not assigned yet. I'll let you know when I get it. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Allan Staller Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:08 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question Apar number? -Original Me

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

Apar number? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

Update on this. I opened a PMR on it and got a reply back from IBM that they are opening an APAR on this. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:32 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] z/OS

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

Koehler Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 3:50 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question This is an interesting discussion. So TYPRUN=COPY is just suppose to copy the JCL to SYSOUT. I am not sure what the expectation is by the OP But on my z/OS 2.3 system with SDSF (I

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

Good point. As a matter of fact, I looked at both jobs' output on both the 2.3 and 2.4 systems with SDSF. To be completely unambiguous, I think I must be wordy & redundant (not a poke at anyone... take that literally). The TYPRUN=COPY job that *ran* on 2.3 displayed with complete JCL in SDSF on b

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

I wonder what EXEC CICS SPOOLREAD brings back? We don't have z/OS 2.4, so can't test against that. On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:43 AM Pommier, Rex wrote: > Hi Steve, > > As the OP, I agree that this doesn't appear to be an SDSF issue. I was > trying to make sure it

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

kely) JES2. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Smith Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 4:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question Well... I just tried it, and it's true... when run on z/OS 2.4, onl

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

isplay. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 3:50 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question This is an interesting discussion. So TYPRUN=COPY is just suppose to cop

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

Well... I just tried it, and it's true... when run on z/OS 2.4, only the job card is listed; whereas on 2.3, all the JCL shows up. N.B.: This isn't an SDSF issue. SDSF does not run jobs, and does not spool their output. JES2 (or 3) does that. sas On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:50

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 1:27 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question I get the same result under z/OS 2.4. I submit the following job: //ALOEFTST JOB $,CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=Y,TYPRUN=COPY //IEFBR14 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14 SDSF has a record count of 12 on the

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

I get the same result under z/OS 2.4. I submit the following job: //ALOEFTST JOB $,CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=Y,TYPRUN=COPY //IEFBR14 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14 SDSF has a record count of 12 on the Held Output Display panel, but only shows 11 when the job is selected. The JESJCLIN DDNAME has

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

Default is MSGLEVEL=(1,1) -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:47 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

T E S T J E S 22.27.13 JOB07842 TUESDAY, 16 JUN 2020 22.27.13 JOB07842 IRR010I USERID BRIANW IS ASSIGNED TO THIS JOB. This is under z/OS 2.4: //BWTESTER JOB (xx

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

Behalf Of Michael Babcock Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 3:21 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question The default MSGLEVEL was 1,1 and that’s what was coded on the jobcard. On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:47 PM Pommier, Rex wrote: > Hi Michael and Al

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

anks again, > > Rex > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Michael Babcock > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:08 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question > > I get the same th

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

> > Thanks again, > > Rex > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Michael Babcock > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:08 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question > > I get

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question I get the same thing you do under z/OS 2.4. About 12 lines of output. I have SDSF. On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex wrote: > Hello list, > > I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, i

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

I get the same thing you do under z/OS 2.4. About 12 lines of output. I have SDSF. On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex wrote: > Hello list, > > I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a > competing product. As part of ou

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

Works for me with no issues. However I use sdsf. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:32 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joe Monk Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:41 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question There is an APAR for 0C4 in JES2 when TYPRUN=COPY... https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/OA57427 Joe On Tue, Jun 16

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

There is an APAR for 0C4 in JES2 when TYPRUN=COPY... https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/OA57427 Joe On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex wrote: > Hello list, > > I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a > competing product. As part of our testing of 2.4

z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

Hello list, I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a competing product. As part of our testing of 2.4, one of my coworkers submitted a job with TYPRUN=COPY on the job card and found it doesn't work. Under 2.2, we get the entire input stream before the JES2 job stat

Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage

On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:30:42 -0400, Kurt Quackenbush wrote: >Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development >Chuck Norris never uses CHECK when he applies PTFs. Chuck Norris doesn't need a a Web App to apply PTFs, he just roundhouse kicks them in. Art Gutowski General Motors, LLC arthur.gutow...@g

Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage

HI Terri, I'm happy you finally got the server up, but sorry to see that you aren't happy with the new format of the upgrade materials for z/OS! If you'd like, please email me your entire list, and we can work through them. Some pieces might be fixed by changing the content of the Upgrade Work

Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage

-2697) C(412-519-2592) terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Marna WALLE Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 12:36 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage External Email Hi Terri, You re

Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage

Hi Terri, You re-ran IZUSETUP, not recently right? That was made obsolete way back on z/OS V2.1 with APAR PI54286 (2016), to move to the "modern" parmlib (IZUPRMxx) method. I hope you still aren't using that, and don't have the server running on your z/OS V2.1 system but rather on a higher sys

Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage

-519-2592) terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kurt Quackenbush Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 8:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage External Email On 3/26/2020 5

Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage

On 3/26/2020 5:45 PM, Shaffer, Terri wrote: It then immediately fails stating z/OSMF cant talk to the 2.1 lpar, because there is no IP address under the SYSTEM tab in z/OSMF. What do you see when you open the Systems tab? Do you see an entry for all 5 of your sysplex members, including your z

z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage

installed the serverpac for z/OS 2.4 and ready to IPL and went looking for the migration guide for 2.4 and used the exploded z/OS 2.2 version (close enough) copy IBM provides. However then I got curious about using z/OSMF, so I downloaded the XML for z/OS 2.2 to 2.4 and the HC_rexx and Discovery

Re: I see a need for general conversion of mappings was Re: C headers in z/OS 2.4

When Pascal is mentioned in this Mainframe related mailing list, this triggers me, of course. I am the current maintainer of the New Stanford Pascal compiler, which runs on MVS, VM (and on Windows, OS/2, Linux, MacOS, BTW) and on modern z/OS (and probably z/VM), too ... although limited to AMODE

Re: I see a need for general conversion of mappings was Re: C headers in z/OS 2.4

> (union and bit mapping) An archaism of C that remains  > because old *nix programs use or used them. >Legacy of the era of expensive RAM. Those days are long gone. There is someone in the chrome browser group who is just now complaining that he has exceeded 70GB ram (yes, ram). For me, GMAI

Re: I see a need for general conversion of mappings was Re: C headers in z/OS 2.4

[Default] On 21 Sep 2019 11:13:59 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Paul Gilmartin) wrote: >On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 10:03:26 -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote: > >>On 9/21/19 9:56 AM, Jon Perryman wrote: >>> It's interesting to see an actual use case for C unio

Re: I see a need for general conversion of mappings was Re: C headers in z/OS 2.4

On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 10:03:26 -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote: >On 9/21/19 9:56 AM, Jon Perryman wrote: >> It's interesting to see an actual use case for C union and bit mapping.  >> In all these years, I've never seen these used in programs I've worked with >> because of portability issues and not

Re: I see a need for general conversion of mappings was Re: C headers in z/OS 2.4

On 9/21/19 9:56 AM, Jon Perryman wrote: It's interesting to see an actual use case for C union and bit mapping.  In all these years, I've never seen these used in programs I've worked with because of portability issues and not really providing useful functionality for those products. An a

Re: I see a need for general conversion of mappings was Re: C headers in z/OS 2.4

It's interesting to see an actual use case for C union and bit mapping.  In all these years, I've never seen these used in programs I've worked with because of portability issues and not really providing useful functionality for those products.  Thanks, Jon. On Friday, September 20, 2019,

Re: I see a need for general conversion of mappings was Re: C headers in z/OS 2.4

Some snippage and interspersed comments... On 2019-09-20 17:11, Jon Perryman wrote: For instance, mapping to C does not support remapping, redefinition or re-declaring variables such as "org" in assembler. Actually, it does, using unions, but the results are not very pretty. Here's an exampl

Re: I see a need for general conversion of mappings was Re: C headers in z/OS 2.4

> XLC has a DSECT conversion utility.  Surprisingly, I think I must have been the only one to generate IPCS mapping automatically using assembler macro's. Less than 100 lines of simple code greatly improved dump reading. As a product developer, I had to read a lot of dumps and this saved a lo

Re: z/OS 2.4 September update collection

Hi Lionel, Seeing this now, after your more recent post on the same subject in the other thread. Thanks, again, for the notice! We're on it... -Sue Shumway On 9/19/2019 8:51 AM, Lionel B Dyck wrote: Downloaded the Sept indexed collection and found a BUG in the 1._Open_Me_First_zOS_V2R4_Adob

  1   2   3   >