Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...)

2023-05-22 Thread David Crayford
STSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of > David Crayford [dcrayf...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2023 11:57 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...) > >> On 22 May 2023, at 8:15 am, Farley, Peter >> <031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@lis

Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...)

2023-05-22 Thread Seymour J Metz
David Crayford [dcrayf...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2023 11:57 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...) > On 22 May 2023, at 8:15 am, Farley, Peter > <031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Please explain what "co

Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...)

2023-05-21 Thread David Crayford
ft have released a Vim (neovim) plugin https://github.com/github/copilot.vim. > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > David Crayford > Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2023 7:47 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (

Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...)

2023-05-21 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 22 May 2023 00:15:52 +, Farley, Peter wrote: >Please explain what "co-pilot" in this context means. I am not familiar with >that reference. > GIYF? ? -- gil -- Fo

Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...)

2023-05-21 Thread Farley, Peter
Please explain what "co-pilot" in this context means. I am not familiar with that reference. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Crayford Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2023 7:47 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF

Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...)

2023-05-21 Thread David Crayford
> -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of > Jack Zukt [jzuk...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2023 3:55 AM > To: IBM-M

Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...)

2023-05-21 Thread Seymour J Metz
behalf of Jack Zukt [jzuk...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2023 3:55 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...) Hi, That made for some interesting reading. I was quite proficient with REXX and XEDIT before moving to MVS and ISPF. The first MVS I worked with did

Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...)

2023-05-21 Thread Seymour J Metz
U Subject: Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...) On Sat, 20 May 2023 08:55:54 +0100, Jack Zukt wrote: >... It was helish doing the transition to ISPF and CLIST. > I started with ISPF/CLIST, berore TSO REXX. I never wrote an ISPF Edit macro in CLIST. I don't forgive CLIST for its apostro

Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...)

2023-05-20 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sat, 20 May 2023 08:55:54 +0100, Jack Zukt wrote: >... It was helish doing the transition to ISPF and CLIST. > I started with ISPF/CLIST, berore TSO REXX. I never wrote an ISPF Edit macro in CLIST. I don't forgive CLIST for its apostrophe catastrophe; seven consecutive apostrophes were not

Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...)

2023-05-20 Thread Jack Zukt
Hi, That made for some interesting reading. I was quite proficient with REXX and XEDIT before moving to MVS and ISPF. The first MVS I worked with did not yet have REXX. It was helish doing the transition to ISPF and CLIST. I still find VM help much better than MVS's. One of the first things that I

Re: XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...)

2023-05-19 Thread Charles Mills
XEDUT (was: Typo ...) Muphry's Law? CM -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

XEDUT vs. ISPF (was: Typo ...)

2023-05-19 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 19 May 2023 18:32:57 -0400, Phil Smith III wrote: >... >>I was trying to automate that in a macro on PF3. > >Yeah, that makes sense. > I learned a smattering of ISPF before any XEDIT; the latter in the era before PQUIT and QQIT intruded: the wrong solution. But I immediately longed for