No, the POR and IPLs were completed before the remote HMC was
installed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Shelia Chalk
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2022 8:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Remote HMC
[[ SEI WARNING *** This
After you made the changes on the HMC did you do a POR then IPL?
Thanks
Shelia Chalk
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Radoslaw Skorupka
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2022 10:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Remote HMC
Tony,
Assuming you
pied
the configs from the old machine are moved the cables from the old HMC to the new HMC.
One interface work for remote access to the remote HMC. One the other interface, I can
ping the remote gateway and the local HMC, but I cannot ping the SEs at the local site so
the manual installat
Thanks for your reply.
We do appear to have a "network" issue. It is strange because we copied
the configs from the old machine are moved the cables from the old HMC to the
new HMC. One interface work for remote access to the remote HMC. One the other
interface, I ca
Well, as far as I understood you have a problem with connectivity.
1. Check network connectivity, internal firewalls, rules, etc.
2. Use "manual object installation" - remote HMC will NOT discover your
CPCs. You have to define it manually, it is not hard.
3. Domain security. Leave
Hi List,
I have a new DR machine (BC15) that we have installed in Austin. The
machine is running and we tested out a DR scenario when we were there. At that
time , we did NOT have our remote HMC installed. A few week later we are now
installing our remote HMC and we are
For multiple reasons, don't. It is a very, very bad idea.
Tony Thigpen
R.S. wrote on 10/29/18 12:03 PM:
I'm going to attach HMC remotely.
Remote means it is behind the router, so no broadcasts are realayed,
that alos mean one has to provide IP of the CPC (instead of
auto-detection), etc.
Howe
I'm going to attach HMC remotely.
Remote means it is behind the router, so no broadcasts are realayed,
that alos mean one has to provide IP of the CPC (instead of
auto-detection), etc.
However due to some limitations I need to use NAT (Network Address
Translation) - is it acceptable for HMC? I
ere is a way to IPL zVM 5.4 from remote
HMC access with a browser, how does one go about it?
The only interaction with HMC is LOAD icon against LPAR icon. You can
have console on OSA-ICC attached emulator session.
A further issue is that FireFox has stopped allowing logon to the HMC
becaus
In Windows Vista, I see only Java 7 Update 45.
Mike
On 01/21/2015 12:03 PM, Mike Schwab wrote:
In Windows, click on Start, Control Panel, Add programs or Programs
and Features, what Java versions are installed?
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Mike Myers wrote:
Elardus:
Thanks for the reply
In Windows, click on Start, Control Panel, Add programs or Programs
and Features, what Java versions are installed?
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Mike Myers wrote:
> Elardus:
>
> Thanks for the reply. Ed elaborated on your fixing firefox information and I
> got that done, but still no joy. I'm
Elardus:
Thanks for the reply. Ed elaborated on your fixing firefox information
and I got that done, but still no joy. I'm going to have to look at the
history. I'm not sure how to identify the problem update nor how to take
it out, but I will look.
Thanks again.
Mike
On 01/21/2015 08:58 A
Mike Myers wrote:
> ... but it seems that my workstation systems have probably changed java
> versions/levels in recent months, as now I am not able to get the Integrated
> 3270 console pop-up on either Ubuntu Linux (12.04) or Windows (Vista pro or
> 7).
You should be able to setup your works
L zVM 5.4 from remote HMC
access with a browser, how does one go about it?
A further issue is that FireFox has stopped allowing logon to the HMC
because it uses SSLv3 and FireFox considers that unsecure. Is there a
way around this in FireFox (Chromium is not as fussy, but only warns
me), Or
W dniu 2014-08-07 14:04, Tom Russell pisze:
AFAIK accessing the "Integrated 3270 session" is impossible from an
HMC browser session. It is also tricky mounting a DVD in the HMC
drive if you want to Gen a new z/VM system in a first level Logical
Partition.
You can use a device on an OSA-ICC t
Thanks Mary Anne! I haven't been paying the proper attention to IBM-MAIN the
last week or so.
Greg
www.mainframecrypto.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
Hi Mike. NewEra makes that available on their website...
http://www.newera.com/INFO/SHARE_HMC_Slides.pdf
MA
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:49:09 -0400, Mike Myers wrote:
>Greg:
>
>I'm not a member of SHARE, but I would sure like to see that
>presentation (or at least the list of "exposures"). Can I
Greg:
I'm not a member of SHARE, but I would sure like to see that
presentation (or at least the list of "exposures"). Can I get it somewhere?
Mike Myers
On 08/07/2014 05:31 PM, Greg Boyd wrote:
Make sure you properly secure the HMC. Paul Robichaux (from NewEra Software)
and Barry Schrager
look into that.
Thank you Lutz.
regards, Tom
On 2014-08-12 12:00 AM, IBM-MAIN automatic digest system wrote:
Date:Mon, 11 Aug 2014 04:39:34 -0500
From:Lutz Hamann
Subject: Re: Remote HMC or HMC with Remote Access
>There is no problem connecting to the Integrated 3270 on a Remote HM
>There is no problem connecting to the Integrated 3270 on a Remote HMC.
>But AFAIK there is no way to connect from a Browser session connected to
>an HMC that is local to the CEC.
>If so I would be happy to know how.
Maybe we use different terminology, Tom ?
What do you understan
There is no problem connecting to the Integrated 3270 on a Remote HMC.
But AFAIK there is no way to connect from a Browser session connected to
an HMC that is local to the CEC.
If so I would be happy to know how.
regards, Tom
On 2014-08-08 12:00 AM, IBM-MAIN automatic digest system wrote
Make sure you properly secure the HMC. Paul Robichaux (from NewEra Software)
and Barry Schrager (from xBridge Systems, and ACF2 fame) did a presentation at
Share in San Francisco in 2013 titled 'The HMC is a Fantastic Tool But Are You
Making It Secure?' Session 12255. They had found a number of
What concerns Integrated 3270-Session usage from a remote HMC I have to admit
that
it is possible with the right Browser- and Java-Setup (i.e. Mozilla Firefox
31.0).
It works for me quite fine i.e. for z/OS Console Sessions or z/VM IPL'ing.
Or did I miss the point here ?
ciao
VM IPL. If you had the DVD already in the HMC drive I suppose you
could do a first level Gen on z/VM remotely, but I haven't tried.
Tom Russell
On 2014-08-07 12:00 AM, IBM-MAIN automatic digest system wrote:
Date:Wed, 6 Aug 2014 15:09:53 +0200
From:"R.S."
Subject: Re:
N@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 08/06/2014 06:10 AM
Subject:Re: Remote HMC or HMC with Remote Access
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
W dniu 2014-08-06 14:27, Williams, Jeff (MGS) pisze:
> Depends on what HMC functions you want to use. Some HMC functions cannot
be peformed
W dniu 2014-08-06 14:27, Williams, Jeff (MGS) pisze:
Depends on what HMC functions you want to use. Some HMC functions cannot be
peformed with the remote web interface. I would have a local HMC console rather
than use it remotely if that's an option. For example, you can't POR remotely,
you ha
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ken Porowski
Sent: August-05-14 4:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Remote HMC or HMC with Remote Access
Any reason to prefer one setup over the other?
Local (my office) HMC connected to remote datac
Preferred: Remote access (from my office) to an HMC in remote datacenters
(50+ miles and 200+ miles)
Built-in redundancy.
Also allow HMC's to network so either location can support the other
i.e.
your office-HMCNETW
In the old days of OS/2 based HMC there was a difference in the bandwith
requirement. Now it's irrelevant.
I know no pro's of remote HMC (maybe except backup critical data)
I know some con's:
- HMC is expensive. Much more expensive than regular PC
- you already have some PC on y
, 2014 4:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Remote HMC or HMC with Remote Access
Any reason to prefer one setup over the other?
Local (my office) HMC connected to remote datacenters (50+ miles and 200+ miles)
Remote access (from my office) to an HMC in remote datacenters (50+ miles and
Any reason to prefer one setup over the other?
Local (my office) HMC connected to remote datacenters (50+ miles and 200+ miles)
Remote access (from my office) to an HMC in remote datacenters (50+ miles and
200+ miles)
I’m going to have 2 datacenters (200+ miles apart) in CoLo providers
Closest
31 matches
Mail list logo
