W dniu 17.11.2024 o 19:21, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
Are RACF rules governing UNIX files defined in terms of pathnames?
What happens if a multiply linked file has names matching conflicting
rules?
o if the rules exist prior to the names?
o If the names exist prior to the rules?
If RACF controls enti
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 05:10:42 -0500, Robert S. Hansel wrote:
>
>RACF profiles don't govern access to individual Unix files and directories.
>Access to a file or directory is governed by its individual File Security
>Packet (FSP) which contains the Owner/User, Group, permissions bits, and
>Extend
Gil,
RACF profiles don't govern access to individual Unix files and directories.
Access to a file or directory is governed by its individual File Security
Packet (FSP) which contains the Owner/User, Group, permissions bits, and
Extended Access Control Lists (ACLs). FSPs are stored in the file's
