W dniu 17.11.2024 o 19:21, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
Are RACF rules governing UNIX files defined in terms of pathnames?
What happens if a multiply linked file has names matching conflicting
rules?
o if the rules exist prior to the names?
o If the names exist prior to the rules?
If RACF controls entire filesystems, no problem exists.
Can you elaborate?
My vision:
Single name - no issue.
Hard link - file security attributes (rwx, ACL) are tied to a file, not
link.
Symlink - can point even to non-existing file. Real (target) file
attributes are considered.
Directory (path) - I haven't check it, but IMHO it depends, that mean
the directory attributes are checked. So it it possible to delete file,
which seems to be protected against it. "Seems to be" - another path to
another name allows delete.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
