Re: Network names (was: System Symbols)

2019-01-04 Thread Seymour J Metz
metz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of scott Ford Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 3:54 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Network names (was: System Symbols) Seymour, In many ways I preferred the SNA architecture over TCPIP. But i have a bias

Re: Network names (was: System Symbols)

2019-01-04 Thread scott Ford
Seymour, In many ways I preferred the SNA architecture over TCPIP. But i have a bias since i did SNA work for many years and knew it very well. Scott On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:05 PM Seymour J Metz wrote: > Well, at one time I expected > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Open_Systems_Inte

Re: Network names (was: System Symbols)

2019-01-02 Thread Seymour J Metz
Well, at one time I expected https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Open_Systems_Interconnection_Profile (GOSIP) to displace SNA, but the Feds went TCP/IP despite the mandate and that was all she wrote. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ___