I believe turning off "write to programmer" messages with TSO PROFILE
NOWTPMSG will hide the ICH408I but you might miss something else you want
to see.
Cheers,
Mick.
On 4 July 2018 at 09:47, Barbara Nitz wrote:
> Something has changed with SDSFAUX between z/OS 2.1 and z/OS 2.3.
>
> Under z/OS 2
Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Barbara Nitz
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 6:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISF.CONNECT.*
I am curious: Why is Rocket Software defending missing SDSF actions and bad
docu
I am curious: Why is Rocket Software defending missing SDSF actions and bad
documentation??? Has IBM 'outsourced' the SDSFAUX server?
I am annoyed with the ISFTABL thing (which we addressed in our logon
procedure), too, because that message was irritating all of us.
The ISF.CONNECT thing is muc
On 7/4/2018 12:13 PM, Rob Scott wrote:
For the record, you do not need ISFTABL to be allocated for SDSF to function
and, in fact, I run without ISFTABL on many of the systems that I use.
If ISFTABL is not found, SDSF retrieves and stores system commands in the ISPF
profile dataset and in this
onley
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 5:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISF.CONNECT.*
On 7/4/2018 11:23 AM, Rob Scott wrote:
> Tom,
>
> I think "cheated" is a bit strong.
>
> If migration actions were omitted it was not by design or with intention to
> deceive, it
For the record, you do not need ISFTABL to be allocated for SDSF to function
and, in fact, I run without ISFTABL on many of the systems that I use.
If ISFTABL is not found, SDSF retrieves and stores system commands in the ISPF
profile dataset and in this mode the user can store up to 50 commands
On 7/4/2018 11:23 AM, Rob Scott wrote:
Tom,
I think "cheated" is a bit strong.
If migration actions were omitted it was not by design or with intention to
deceive, it was most likely because it got missed due to human error.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software.
Rob,
When I asked why the ISFTABL mes
o:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Conley
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 4:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISF.CONNECT.*
On 7/4/2018 6:38 AM, Rob Scott wrote:
> Barbara,
>
> From the SDSF z/OS 2.3 Operation and Customization Guide :
>
> "As of z/OS V2
On 7/4/2018 6:38 AM, Rob Scott wrote:
Barbara,
From the SDSF z/OS 2.3 Operation and Customization Guide :
"As of z/OS V2R3, SDSF requires the SDSF and SDSFAUX address spaces to be
active for full functionality. The SDSF address space manages connections,
processes ISFPRMxx statements, handles
Barbara,
From the SDSF z/OS 2.3 Operation and Customization Guide :
"As of z/OS V2R3, SDSF requires the SDSF and SDSFAUX address spaces to be
active for full functionality. The SDSF address space manages connections,
processes ISFPRMxx statements, handles operator commands, and starts and
stops S
10 matches
Mail list logo
