To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question on DISP=MOD and GDGs
Hi,
Your conclusion is correct, but there is a currently known problem with PRO/JCL
(from ASG) that erroneously says that it's not valid. There are actually
several PRO/JCL problems that we have open with ASG c
Hi,
Your conclusion is correct, but there is a currently known problem with PRO/JCL
(from ASG) that erroneously says that it's not valid. There are actually
several PRO/JCL problems that we have open with ASG currently, related to GDG
processing with tape and also tape processing with disp=MOD
e
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
>> Lizette Koehler
>> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 3:50 PM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Question on DISP=MOD and GDGs
>>
>> List -
>>
to understand why some might think these sample coding is invalid.
Thanks
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Lizette Koehler
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 3:50 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Question on
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Question on DISP=MOD and GDGs
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of CA. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
List -
I am having a discussion on how a GDG is handled based on the DISP
List -
I am having a discussion on how a GDG is handled based on the DISP. I was
always working from the position that the use of MOD changes JCL behavior
slightly with a dataset. My understanding is: If using MOD then if the dataset
does not exist, it is treated as NEW and if it exists then tr
