Yes, a DISP=(MOD,CATLG) defaults to DISP=(NEW,CATLG) if the DSN does not
exist.

The following *might* be invalid, as it would be referring to a GDG entry DSN 
that already exists (but it might also just issue a 'NOT CATLG 2' or similar 
JES2 log message):
"//SMFOUT DD DSN=SMFHLQ.DAILY.SMFDSN(0),  "
"// DISP=(MOD,CATLG,DELETE)               "  <--- not 'CATLG' again
It would 'correctly' have to be:
"//SMFOUT DD DSN=SMFHLQ.DAILY.SMFDSN(0),  "
"// DISP=(MOD,KEEP,KEEP)                  "
 
Why not try it using a test GDG hlq DSN and/or on a test LPAR to see what 
happens, regardless of JCL checks?  
 
My ha'penny. CP


On 08/10/2018 18:38, Lizette Koehler wrote:
> The question was not about the JCL Check process returning a 4 or an 8 
>
>
> It was more on when using DISP=MOD, would any of the sample provided be 
> against
> JCL rules?
>
> My understanding is if DISP=MOD is used, then if the dataset does not exist,
> create it, if it does exist append to it.
>
> Just trying to understand why some might think these sample coding is invalid.
>
> Thanks
>
> Lizette
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of
>> Lizette Koehler
>> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 3:50 PM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Question on DISP=MOD and GDGs
>>
>> List -
>>
>> I am having a discussion on how a GDG is handled based on the DISP.  I was
>> always working from the position that the use of MOD changes JCL behavior
>> slightly with a dataset.  My understanding is:  If using MOD then if the
>> dataset does not exist, it is treated as NEW and if it exists then treated as
>> OLD.  That seems reasonable, however, I have some users coding this for GDGs
>> and I am not sure why they should work.
>>
>>
>> Now the following are samples and I am sure there are other coding that I
>> have not included.
>>
>>
>>
>> So based on the following, which should be considered incorrect coding
>>
>> 1) First time creating the new Daily dataset.  There is also a concern on the
>> second coding
>>
>>
>>     //SMFOUT DD DSN=SMFHLQ.DAILY.SMFDSN(+1),
>>     // DISP=(MOD,CATLG,DELETE),
>>     // STORCLAS=NONSMS,EXPDT=99000,
>>     // RECFM=VBS,BLKSIZE=32000,LRECL=32760,BUFNO=10,
>>     // UNIT=TAPE
>>     *** WARN 04: DISP FOR NEW GDG DATASET IS NOT (NEW,CATLG)
>>
>> Appending SMF data daily dataset
>>
>>     //SMFOUT DD DSN=SMFHLQ.DAILY.SMFDSN(0),
>>     // DISP=(MOD,CATLG,DELETE
>>     *** WARN 04: DISP FOR NEW GDG DATASET IS NOT (NEW,CATLG)
>>
>>
>>
>> 2)  Using BR14 with MOD DELETE for a GEN that has NOT been created
>>
>>     //S1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
>>     //GDGBASE DD
>> DISP=(MOD,DELETE,DELETE),DSN=TSOHLQ.GDGTEST(0),SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)),UNIT=SYSDA
>>     !!!ERROR 04: GDG(0) NOT PERMITTED WITH DISP=NEW
>>
>>
>> GDG does not have any GENs yet.  So get the following
>>
>>     //COPYIT1 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
>>     //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
>>     //*
>>     //*
>>     //SYSIN DD DUMMY
>>     //SYSUT2 DD DISP=(MOD,CATLG,DELETE),UNIT=SYSDA,
>>     // SPACE=(CYL,(1,1),RLSE),
>>     // DSN=TSOHLQ.GDGTEST(+1)
>>     *** WARN 04: DISP FOR NEW GDG DATASET IS NOT (NEW,CATLG)
>>     //SYSUT1 DD *
>>      TEST RECORD
>>
>>
>> The GDG has one generation in the base I am able to see this should work
>>
>>    //****************************************************************
>>    //*
>>    //****************************************************************
>>    //S1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
>>    //GDGBASE DD DISP=(MOD,DELETE,DELETE),DSN=TSOHLQ.GDGTEST(0)
>>
>>
>> I am not saying these are great ways to code DISP=MOD, just that I have seen
>> this coding work but have been told that they should not work or they would
>> cause weird/crazy results
>>
>>
>> Any and all opinions welcome.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> Lizette Koehler
>> statistics: A precise and logical method for stating a half-truth
>> inaccurately
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
>> lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> .
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to