M-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 12/19/2018 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: CFCC Performance
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Thin interrupts were introduced as a performance booster for shared CF
engines. However when we recently upgraded both CECs to z14 and z13, we
discovered that we c
e-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Mike Schwab
> Sent: 18 December, 2018 19:23
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: CFCC Performance
>
> We had 4 CFs. Two for the TestPlex and two for the Production Plex.
&g
; From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Mike Schwab
> Sent: 18 December, 2018 19:23
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: CFCC Performance
>
> We had 4 CFs. Two for the TestPlex and two for the Production Plex.
>
> On Tue, De
l Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Allan Staller
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 10:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: CFCC Performance
Mike,
Are you using Structure Duplexing and/or System managed rebuild?
Mike,
Are you using Structure Duplexing and/or System managed rebuild?
Al
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mike Schwab
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 12:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CFCC Performance
We had 4 CFs. Two for the
We had 4 CFs. Two for the TestPlex and two for the Production Plex.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:37 AM Allan Staller wrote:
>
> I am in the process or reconfiguring from a Single CF to multiple CFs (per
> partition) to eliminate the single point of failure.
> The subject of CFCC Thin Interrupts h
I am in the process or reconfiguring from a Single CF to multiple CFs (per
partition) to eliminate the single point of failure.
The subject of CFCC Thin Interrupts has been evaluated and will most likely be
implemented.
As part of this process the discussion of DUPLEX CF structure vs. use of SYS
