On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 23:19, Joseph Reichman wrote:
> Seymour was right there is something wrong with TEST or in my case
> TESTAUTH I made breakpoint way after SPKA X'40' did a listpsw and saw the
> PSW key of 4
>
> However now I am getting an invalid address when trying to set breakpoints
> am
Yes,
Many products, SAS, several Broadcom, ASG (now Rocket) and several others now
send a file or files that they want loaded into a zfs. Normally they ship it
in PAX format so that you can unpax it, but sometimes it's in other formats as
well.
I don't see any issues with creating the zfs f
Seymour was right there is something wrong with TEST or in my case TESTAUTH I
made breakpoint way after SPKA X'40' did a listpsw and saw the PSW key of 4
However now I am getting an invalid address when trying to set breakpoints am
using the AT + and its giving me invalid address
-Or
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 21:47, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>
> I am trying to change psw storage key from "Normal" key 8 to Key 4
>
> SPKA X'40'
>
> I have bit 15 of the psw 0 ,meaning I am in supervisor state and get a s0c1
> running this code under TESTAUTH
>
A program check 1 is not possible if you
Ill give it a shot hold on
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2023 9:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Cant SPKA to PSW Key 4
This sounds like a problem with TEST. Have you tried a different deb
This sounds like a problem with TEST. Have you tried a different debugger?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Joseph Reichman
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2023 9:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Cant SPKA to PSW Key 4
Hi
I am
Hi
I am trying to change psw storage key from "Normal" key 8 to Key 4
SPKA X'40'
I have bit 15 of the psw 0 ,meaning I am in supervisor state and get a s0c1
running this code under TESTAUTH
I am able to get to PSW key 0 SPKA 0
Don't get it
Thanks
I had an interesting experience at a client (Defence). I was sitting in a
shared area with an IBM rep and a couple of Defence staff.
I put a USB stick into my desktop and a Defence public servant went off at
me. I had no idea that it was forbidden since at another client site, the
USB ports were d
Ignore my last question - you just answered it.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2023 4:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: SCRT and not operating LPAR
Hi Radoslaw,
I'm not den
Hi Radoslaw,
I'm not denying your experience. You got me questioning my own so I had to go
back and make sure it was working like I had expected it to. :-) I did also
misspeak. You are correct, it was an e-mail with the CSV sent as an
attachment. This was the mechanism IBM took away and t
Bonnie,
You're right - deactivated LPAR means no issue to solve. More - there
are better reasons to keep such LPARs deactivated.
However sometimes it is convenient a little bit to have such LPAR "ready
to use". Is it good reason? Nevermind, I'm just asking about SCRT
results of such scenario
As I noted things may have changed. I really tried to do it, but it was
10+ years ago. After that I did not come back to try it again and again.
BTW: I was very first user of SCRT in Poland, it was January 2006, AFAIR.
Actually I don't understand the way you submit reports. In the past few
way
I must be missing something. Why not deactivate the non-operating lpars? SCRT
will not report them and you will not have to explain. Bonnie
Bonnie Barthel
Senior IT Specialist
719.649.7888 Mobile
bonnie.bart...@kyndryl.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Beh
I just double-checked the latest report I submitted with comments added to my
mainframe CSV file, and the comments are on the report on the LMS site.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2023 4:10 PM
To: IBM
With all due respect, I have to disagree. Granted I haven't had to make any
explanations to LMS since IBM took away the FTP transmission and required us to
go through the web site for transmissions, but before that I would add my
comments to the mainframe version of the CSV and then directly FT
You cannot update CSV file. There is a checksum at the bottom. Any
update, including such comment causes the file will not be accepted by
the LMS. BTDT.
Of course it is possible to upload the file to LMS and then add
explanations. But then IBM knows the rest of file is not amended.
BTW: I'm p
Hi John,
Actually I think you remembered right the first time. :-) When our sandbox is
down for an extended period, I get the "(required)" in the CSV file as well. I
just change "(required)" with "LPAR down for refresh" or whatever reason the
LPAR isn't reporting SMF data and then send the C
I always ask permission before downloading CBT tools or anything else like
that, or my own free tools. In days of old, I backed it up to 3480 carts.
Then TSO XMIT of my PDSes and keeping them on a USB drive. I have seen USBs
locked down, but that hasn't been a problem for me.
If I was doing
Whether I like it or not it's time to download a PSWI.
The IBM tutorial makes reference to loading the PWSI in to OMVS, which begs
the question:
Has anyone created a zFS for IBM products and another for BMC products, etc
Any guidance would be appreciated
Steve
They could of had had a exlst on the DCBE with xl5 ds x for the code and xl4
for the address
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2023 10:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: BSAM Read 31 bit mode
On
If that LPAR is not generating 70 or 89 records you just have to account for
The your LPARS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2023 12:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
Misremembered. The CVS file says "(required)". When uploaded to IBM there
is a prompt, in red, to fill the field in. That's when I enter "not in use".
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023, 04:52 John McKown
wrote:
> We have this situation. There is a REMARKS field in the SCRT cvs file. I
> put the sentence "No
That link is for buttons. I'm looking for material on the paddle that Robert
Rannie carried as a symbol of the OS/360 project and which he repaired after an
IBM rep broke it. The repair became known as a Paddle Temporary fix (PTYF).
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
Button 677 at https://www.mxg.com/thebuttonman
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2023 5:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Paddle temporary fix?
Does anybody remember the SHARE and players for the "Pa
Thanks a lot!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Im Auftrag von
Sam Golob
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2023 16:24
An: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Betreff: Sam Golob articles are now directly online
Dear Folks,
Recently I received a request to put my (over
Does anybody remember the SHARE and players for the "Paddle Temporary Fix" of
Robert Ranie's paddle, and is there an online description? Thanks.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
--
For IBM-MAIN subscrib
We have this situation. There is a REMARKS field in the SCRT cvs file. I
put the sentence "No longer in use." in that field during the generation of
it on my Windows desktop. I've done that for years now with no problems
with IBM.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023, 04:05 Radoslaw Skorupka <
0471ebeac275-dm
They are already available as XMI files. The point of the individual files is
to allow them to be viewed from a web file. The motivation for that was the
need to cite therm for, e.g., wiki.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From:
As it is known, all the z/OS LPAR have to report SMF data to SCRT
otherwise SCRT report would contain "data missing" field for given LPAR
and explanation will be required.
What about not operating LPARs?
I mean an LPAR which is Activated, but not IPLed. Or the OS was shut
down and LPAR was rese
29 matches
Mail list logo
