Found it:
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6355789
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/system/files/inline-files/IBM_z15_FEx16SA_Performance_2020.pdf
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 9:28 AM, kekronbekron
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.e
Hi Attila,
For the curious, a link to the study will be helpful.
Is it in TechDocs?
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 9:05 AM, Attila Fogarasi
wrote:
> I don't know about that particular benchmark, but IBM has a published z15
>
> zHPF benchmark which do
Hey Patrick,
Please share some info about what enables this, to the extent that you can.
I read in some storage blog that Infinidat for example does 30-40 mics on
average.
With CFs being 2-10 mics, and zHyperLink being ~20 mics, 30-40 for the average
I/O seems pretty good.
The 400-500 mics that
Ugh...
Those who want to have fun technically can also look at doing this with RACF
SMF headers from 2.5 onwards.
With a near real-time SMF feed.
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 9:35 PM, Sebastian Welton
wrote:
> I've done similar with AF/Operator bu
I don't know about that particular benchmark, but IBM has a published z15
zHPF benchmark which does 300k+ IO/sec over a SINGLE FEx16SA channel (using
multiple ports). That was published almost 2 years ago (jan 2020).
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:18 PM Clark F. Morris <
03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@
Gents, please. No body cares.
Joe
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021, 22:05 Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> No, I quoted IBM I/O claims. Of the mainframe. Even cut & pasted from the
> IBM manual. But, we all know you like to always think you’re right. Parsing
> stuff is
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz
wrote:
>Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite significant,
>and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the performance that BJ
>claimed, but we're not there yet.
When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-
No, I quoted IBM I/O claims. Of the mainframe. Even cut & pasted from the IBM
manual. But, we all know you like to always think you’re right. Parsing stuff
is your narcissist MO, looking for little things that really aren’t even part
of the original reason for the thread. The fact is the mainfra
Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite significant,
and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the performance that BJ
claimed, but we're not there yet.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM M
You started saying 1 microsecond and retreated to 4, which is still a long way
from 500. And you're a falure as a telepath; you don't have a clue what I'm
thinking.
My MO is to act as if facts matter.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
___
Stated well
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.
** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
“Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz s
“Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED
that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his MO.
Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play games
trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more impor
Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you
not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily
state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you
in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My pos
https://www.networkworld.com/article/3644149/ibm-offers-one-stop-shop-for-mainframe-hybrid-cloud-initiatives.html#jump
Regards,
Mark Regan, K8MTR, EN80tg
CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1979 active; 1979-1991, reserves; including two
years with the Ohio Air National Guard)
Nationwide Insurance, Retired,
https://www.10tv.com/article/news/nation-world/what-caused-the-amazon-internet-outage/507-94219aa6-f510-4e3d-a2b5-5c301a257152
"A problem with Amazon Web Services yesterday caused issues with services
such as Disney+ and Venmo for most of the day. Robotic vacuum cleaners
halted in their tracks
LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable
con
Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable
conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on avg.
mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon,
Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: S
Thanks, Kurt - Yeah I saw the ability to export to CVS. Not an ideal
solution, but workable.
Sorry on the terminology, first time working with z/OSMF.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 3:32 PM Kurt J. Quackenbush wrote:
> > Part of the workflow is to create “Missing SYSMOD Reports’. I get the
> > workfl
You should know nonsense.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 3:00 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Four microseconds is also nonsense.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ..
> Part of the workflow is to create “Missing SYSMOD Reports’. I get the
> workflow to run and it creates a web page table output of Missing
SYSMODS.
(Just to clarify terminology, you're talking about the "Check for missing
SYSMODs" step in the Deployment checklist in z/OSMF Software Management.
Four microseconds is also nonsense.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 12:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.
About as
Going through the installation of z/OS 2.5 using z/OSMF.
Part of the workflow is to create “Missing SYSMOD Reports’. I get the
workflow to run and it creates a web page table output of Missing SYSMODS.
What is missing, unless I didn’t see the option, is to create a Dataset
(SMPPUNCH) that will
Or narcissists.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 12:38 PM, Charles Mills
wrote:
Don't feed the trolls.
Charles
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Don't feed the trolls.
Charles
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
About as relevant as the thousands of posts you make. Sorry, 4 microseconds.
On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 12:11:24 PM EST, Seymour J Metz
wrote:
Then how is it relevant to the alleged one microsecond I/O?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
It might be, but Puta has done similar things in the past.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 11:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
Then how is it relevant to the alleged one microsecond I/O?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
The very same day Putin was warned about Ukraine. Coincidence?
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 11:33 AM, Lance D. Jackson
wrote:
Here’s more insight into the issue:
https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/report-aws-uncertain-about-true-cause-of-massive
Here’s more insight into the issue:
https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/report-aws-uncertain-about-true-cause-of-massive-outage-internal-note-warns-of-firewall-overwhelmed-by-unknown-source/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Johnson
I've done similar with AF/Operator but many, many years ago. I wonder if this
is the future of doing this:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/z-chatops/1.1.0?topic=overview
Sebastian
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 10:15:58 -0500, IBM user wrote:
>Has anyone implemented a feed from Syslog using RSS and AF/OPER?
Of course not.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
ObTheRaven On one channel?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSER
ObTheRaven On one channel?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 20
I should say one thing though... your last statement makes me feel secure with
my career lol.
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 8:15 PM, Bill Johnson
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> In 10 years, the mainframe will process some
In 10 years, the mainframe will process some multiple of transactions it does
today. Likely a very high multiple.
On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:42:26 AM EST, kekronbekron
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
"...I don't want my health care information or my fina
JP Morgan/Chase has been around since 1799, well the Chase part. They aren't
going to be replaced by some Fintech started by a guy/gal barely past puberty.
And if any Fintech gets it right, I suspect Jamie Dimon will just purchased
them and roll them into the bank.
On Wednesday, December
"...I don't want my health care information or my financial data running on
those platforms."... yet.
Maybe not Goog or MS, but AWS will surely keep trying to eat IBM's pie.
Already, there's zPDT for dev/test-ing in AWS.
I mean, it's not real workload, there's still IBM licensing and all, but par
What I've been saying for years and catching flack for it. I have my pictures
on AWS, and buy things that likely run on AWS, or Azure/Google cloud. But, I
don't want my health care information or my financial data running on those
platforms.
On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:26:17 AM EST,
Speaking of finance... changing gears a bit.
What's everyone's thoughts on the FinTech developments, digital bank, etc. ?
Are they all still just relying on MF for actually doing the work, and just
presenting a rosy image to customers and developers?
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wed
Its all about the workload. AWS is not a platform to run the world’s finances
on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where BASE is
acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than the
existing processes in many shops today.
I have a truck and a Honda Pilo
Of course, understandable.
Does IBM not care about the 'ye olde' image that IBM Z gets in the media.
In a recent zOSMF Guild discussion here, we saw a bit of 'trying to be
cool/relevant' vibes instead.
What I often find myself saying is.. all this MF modernization talk is acting
as if MF is as b
Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec.
On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz
wrote:
On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
___
Understandable, which is why I said.. for those who can choose a
cut-loose-from-compat release.
I can't even imagine how much better zOS will get, having cut out tiny or huge
baggage here and there.
Example: In the recent SHARE's DSFS (dataset file system) session, it was
mentioned that it supp
On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent:
What's the difference between managing 100s of squatty boxes and managing 100s
of virtual machines? What matters are the facilities available.
Lack of, e.g., RAS, matters, but not the number of boxen.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
Perhaps it is a mainframe opportunity?
Thanks,
…….Cameron
Vacation Alert: I will be OOO from December 9th 2021 though to January 4th 2022
inclusive.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 11:52 PM
To: IBM-
I have watched this thread, and there is simply one thing most of us are
missing.
This is a MF forum. For years, we have been subjected to "oh using the
(insert new technology) is so much better than these old obsolete
mainframes." And we have universally warned not to drink the Kool-Aid.
So e
Hi KB,
You goofed again. Your head must be in the clouds (pun intended).
You said: "... cut out all the baggage of backward compatibility ..."
Backward compatibility is a big part of customer loyalty. Customers
expect that their applications will run when processors are upgraded.
For example, I
I don't know, but it will be good to compare solutions like this; without any
unnecessary sales flexing built into it.
Reckon it's very hard to find someone who knows enough about the major
IaaS/PaaS ways that are out there to give us an objective view.
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On
Just a very simple question: They know word CONTINGENCY and data MIRROR?
Most of mainframe installations that I know today has contingency plans, mirror
backup links, backup power sources etc... Cloud haven´t this, or is too
expensive?
Carlos Bodra
IBM zEnterprise Certified
São Paulo – SP – Br
True, I haven't worked in healthcare.
I do apologize for being a bit dramatic in refuting the initial statement.
I just don't get the 'this way or no way' perspective, however understandable
it is.
IBM's own quantum efforts may make MF irrelevant.
Tech will keep evolving, yes MF is excellent at w
Of course, agreed. Just saying that MF isn't the one and only, best possible
server/platform, in all of time.
What's wrong with others trying, however futile it may or may not be.
IBM sure did try when they first created the MF.
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, December 8th,
Classification: Confidential
Yes I remember those days. However, at may last job I went 9 years without an
unscheduled service disruption.
I have said for many years, that all other things being equal (which they
still are not), would you rather manage 100's of squatty boxes or one mainframe?
I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes,
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.
You said: "... Did the world not exist before 1960s?
Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? ..."
Yes, the world existed before the 1960s and, no, nobody died as a result
of no mainframe.
You're forgetting that the world was a different place then.
Computer-based
A 'The Register' article post last evening...
"AWS wobbles in US East region causing widespread outages'We have
identified the root cause and we are actively working towards recovery' -
which now appears almost complete"
The article was then updated this morning, with an updated status at the
end
55 matches
Mail list logo