Bill Giannelli wrote:
>Our network security group (with no mainframe knowledge) is complaining
>about the use of telnet for mainframe connections as they say it is not
>encrypted.
Your network security group is correct to complain.
>We use attachmate and HOD. Are there any 3270 emulators that als
Jo Monk said:
Last I checked, PDUs are not sold by watts, but by volts/amps.
Sure they are. Doesn't magically turn into power. A/C power consumption is
not that easily derived, unlike DC. I'll continue to use the laws of
physics.
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 1:41 AM Peter wrote:
> Thank you for th
Very interesting, and thanks for the hint. I added a second getmsg()
after executing the VTAM command and achieved success. No CART needed,
just a straightforward CONSOLE SYSCMD(D NET,E... and 2X getmsg().
Still does not explain why it sometimes works with just 1X, though, but
again, thanks!
As far as I know we are not running WAS or any SSO product. How would they show
up if we were? What would the name most likely be in SDSF DA?
As I said in my post, "NETSTAT shows nothing on the failing ports."
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-M
Port 2710 is SSO and WAS (Websphere) optionally implements SSO ... sounds
like you have WAS configured for single signon.
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 4:13 AM Charles Mills wrote:
> I have been seeing intermittent FTP failures in a particular environment
> and
> when they occurred I was always up to m
I found with VTAM messages output, there were 2x messages that were provided.
The first provided the command accepted. The 2nd message, in this case, had 22
lines seen below in the REXX trace. I've always been forced to this 2x message
response for VTAM.
/* Rexx */
trace r
'consprof soldisp
On 5/5/2021 2:58 PM, Michael Babcock wrote:
I would highly discourage the use of the ciphers listed. I would use
these more secure ciphers (I'm sure there are others that are acceptable).
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC
Hi,
I got a response off-list about using FCTOPPRCPRIMARY (thank you for that
response) but unfortunately my PPRC is async so that parm doesn't help. So I
guess I'm not going to be using FC to make these copies.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
I've tried this (2 minute delay):
netcmd = 'DISPLAY NET,E,ID=' || vtamlu
if test = 'TEST' then say 'Command:' netcmd
"CONSOLE SYSCMD(" netcmd ") CART(VTAM)"
msg = getmsg(netresp.,'either','VTAM',,120)
And this:
"CONSOLE SYSCMD(" netcmd ") CART(VPSC0002)"
msg = getmsg(netresp.,'SOL',VPSC
On 5 May 2021 11:13:21 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<0ceb01d741da$50264400$f072cc00$@mcn.org>)
charl...@mcn.org (Charles Mills) wrote:
>My FTP client succeeds when the port is 1025, 1026, 1027,
... etc. until it
>gets to port 2240, when the dialog looks like
>
>EZA1736I GET 'd
Can you post your code with CART and a two-second delay?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Sims
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 11:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DISPLAY VTAM commands from TSO
I would highly discourage the use of the ciphers listed. I would use
these more secure ciphers (I'm sure there are others that are acceptable).
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Hello list,
I'm having a mental midget moment. I have an IBM DS array that is a PPRC
source to a second array. Some volumes are being replicated to the remote site
and others are not. I am doing dataset level flashcopy through DF/DSS COPY
commands from one SMS storage group to another on the
Thanks, I've tried with/without CART, as well as waiting up to 2 minutes
for responses, with no change in the dreary outcome.
/Tom
On 5/5/2021 11:16 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Program in a delay.. I'd also suggest using a CART.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
___
+1 to both suggestions.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 11:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DISPLAY VTAM commands from TSO CONSOLE
Program in a delay.
Program in a delay.. I'd also suggest using a CART.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Tom
Sims [trs...@att.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 2:10 PM
To: IB
I have been seeing intermittent FTP failures in a particular environment and
when they occurred I was always up to my butt in some other mess of
alligators so I just moved on from the FTP problem at the time. Yesterday
and today I set out to try to nail it down and I am looking for help in
understa
I am having difficulty obtaining predictable and repeatable results from
DISPLAY VTAM commands in TSO CONSOLE.
In all cases, the first response is returned, e.g., for processing via
getmsg():
10:06:05.30 SYSTVPSC 0290 DISPLAY NET,ID=SYSTP011
10:06:05.31 SYSTVPSC 0090 IST097I DISPLAY
>Dave,
Here you go:
>##
># #
>
># Secure FTP Application #
>
>#
Dave,
Here you go:
##
# #
# Secure FTP Application #
#
> Well, for what it's worth, I just tried it and my job was successful,
> however, I also received the SSLv23/TLSv1 messages. So I used the standard
> job that IBM provided (RFNJOBS) and I turned on Debug SEC. Here is what I got
(snip)
Hey Tony, Thanks for this. For some reason we are
Thanks a good option I forgot about, I added my z/OS product, CSI, CICS, DB2,
you can easily add other OEM products
Carmen Vitullo
-Original Message-
From: Kurt
To: IBM-MAIN
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2021 11:28 AM CDT
Subject: Re: Software Inventory
On 5/4/2021 11:14 AM, Stee
It's not hard to configure port 23 (or any port you choose) for TLS and 3270
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2021 8:13 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: 3270 emulator / telnet with encryptio
On 5/4/2021 11:14 AM, Steely.Mark wrote:
This is a general question what do you use for software inventory - package,
ISPF, excel spreadsheet etc for Mainframe only.
Below is the type of inventory I am looking for.
This is what I found so far on the Internet : (This is a PDF document and
Thank you for the clarification. Now it help me to research further.
On Wed, 5 May, 2021, 7:29 pm Billy Ashton, wrote:
> You also might need to consider if you have redundant power supplies or
> redundant/diverse power sources. There will not be a single definition
> of power consumption based o
I know that QWS (Jolly Giant software) has a QWS 3270 Secure product.
-- Original Message --
From: "Bill Giannelli"
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: 5/5/2021 6:14:43 AM
Subject: 3270 emulator / telnet with encryption
Our network security group (with no mainframe knowledge) is complai
You also might need to consider if you have redundant power supplies or
redundant/diverse power sources. There will not be a single definition
of power consumption based on the number of units or even the number of
devices. A 12U rack used as a patch panel will have no consumption, but
a 12u UP
On Wed, 5 May 2021 16:20:05 +0200, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>W dniu 05.05.2021 o 12:14, Bill Giannelli pisze:
>> Our network security group (with no mainframe knowledge) ...
>
>TLS encryption is supported by most emulators including PCOMM, Nexus,
>free wc3270, Vista, ZOC, Rumba, QWS...
>Note: TLS
Fine with me! I haven't worked with VM in so many years I never heard
of "IPL ZCMS" so that's good to stuff in the back of my brain in case
it's ever needed.
On 5/5/2021 7:47 AM, Jim Mulder wrote:
Yes, I know I sent this response to the wrong list with
the wrong subject. I will get it sen
In general I know what is installed, what is licensed, how is it
licensed, etc.
I did some inventory for that, including software bundles, sub-bundles
and components down to every FMID installed.
Regarding description - I don't need that, but I created few for less
obvious entries.
It was quite
Yes, I know I sent this response to the wrong list with
the wrong subject. I will get it sent to the right
place. I find dump reading to be easy, and using end-user
interfaces to be challenging for me.
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp.
Poughkeepsie NY
(845) 435
I suspect that you did "IPL CMS" and are running in
ESA/390 Compatibility Mode.
First and most importantly, a client should not be
executing a z/Architecture-only instruction while in
ESA/390 compatibility mode. That is unpredictable
behavior and is definitely not intended to be used.
Se
W dniu 05.05.2021 o 08:25, Peter pisze:
Hello
Apology for posting a non mainframe questions here .
Is there a way to determine the total power consumption of rack with 12u as
form factor ?
I am sure some of them would have used a benchmark to design a solution for
any new server coming inside
We use AT-TLS with our Bluezone product
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 9:20 AM Radoslaw Skorupka
wrote:
> W dniu 05.05.2021 o 12:14, Bill Giannelli pisze:
> > Our network security group (with no mainframe knowledge) is complaining
> about the use of telnet for mainframe connections as they say it is not
W dniu 05.05.2021 o 12:09, Bill Giannelli pisze:
We have IOF and it seems the jes spool is filled preventing logon.
Is there a way I can purge a specific job's output with a route command from
another LPAR?
thanks
You don't need another LPAR. You need console.
In case of lack of console just u
W dniu 05.05.2021 o 12:14, Bill Giannelli pisze:
Our network security group (with no mainframe knowledge) is complaining about
the use of telnet for mainframe connections as they say it is not encrypted. We
use attachmate and HOD. Are there any 3270 emulators that also do encryption?
thanks
T
Last I checked, PDUs are not sold by watts, but by volts/amps.
Joe
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 5:52 AM Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
> Amps are not power. Watts are.
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2021, 20:08 Joe Monk wrote:
>
> > Yes. Take the value in watts of each power supply. Divide watts by volts
> > to get a
On Wed, 5 May 2021 12:42:58 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>
>Afaik, Most 3270 emulators(not all) support TLS encryption. It is merely a
>session setup parameter.
>You will also need to configure the TELNET server to support encryption as
>well,
>
See: https://www.microfocus.com/en-us/products/extr
have you exported a workflow that you have updated?
I'll checking my exported file but I believe the steps and the notes are
contained.
Carmen Vitullo
-Original Message-
From: Ravi
To: IBM-MAIN
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2021 8:05 AM CDT
Subject: Re: zOSMF - Workflow Histor
Hi Bill,
You didn't say what release you are on but starting in JES V2R3 there is JES
privilege support to handle this. Here is a link for an article from Mr. JES2
Tom Wasik https://developer.ibm.com/articles/jes2-privilege-support/
Doug
On Wed, 5 May 2021 05:09:53 -0500, Bill Giannelli
wrot
I need the history(steps which has been executed) export of the workflow not
the workflow itself..
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO I
>From the workflows you can select the workflow and select actions IIRC and
>export the workflow, it exports the entire workflow in a HTML document
Carmen Vitullo
-Original Message-
From: Ravi
To: IBM-MAIN
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2021 7:42 AM CDT
Subject: zOSMF - Workflow Hi
Classification: Confidential
Afaik, Most 3270 emulators(not all) support TLS encryption. It is merely a
session setup parameter.
You will also need to configure the TELNET server to support encryption as well,
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mi
Does anybody has worked on way to export history of the workflow for auditing
purpose.? if so any leads may help...Thanks in advance.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@lists
That depends on the use profile. What equipment is in continuous use and what
is standby. Are you counting power for cooling?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behal
Amps are not power. Watts are.
On Wed, May 5, 2021, 20:08 Joe Monk wrote:
> Yes. Take the value in watts of each power supply. Divide watts by volts
> to get amps. Then just add up the amps.
>
> Example: I have a rack of 12 servers. Each server has 2 770w power
> supplies. My voltage is 208vac.
If it's in the same JESplex then you don't need a route command, just a normal
purge.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Bill Giannelli [billgianne...@gmai
What's wrongwith running a 3270 client in an encrypted VPN?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Bill Giannelli [billgianne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May
RO RMTJEs,$PJn
Or $PT1- will remove old TSO session output
On Wed, May 5, 2021, 20:10 Bill Giannelli wrote:
> We have IOF and it seems the jes spool is filled preventing logon.
> Is there a way I can purge a specific job's output with a route command
> from another LPAR?
> thanks
> Bil
We use Bluezone which does encryption (TLS 1.2)
On 5/5/2021 5:14 AM, Bill Giannelli wrote:
Our network security group (with no mainframe knowledge) is complaining about
the use of telnet for mainframe connections as they say it is not encrypted. We
use attachmate and HOD. Are there any 3270 em
Our network security group (with no mainframe knowledge) is complaining about
the use of telnet for mainframe connections as they say it is not encrypted. We
use attachmate and HOD. Are there any 3270 emulators that also do encryption?
thanks
Bill
We have IOF and it seems the jes spool is filled preventing logon.
Is there a way I can purge a specific job's output with a route command from
another LPAR?
thanks
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instru
Yes. Take the value in watts of each power supply. Divide watts by volts
to get amps. Then just add up the amps.
Example: I have a rack of 12 servers. Each server has 2 770w power
supplies. My voltage is 208vac.
770w / 208 vac = 3.7 amps. So each power supply can draw a MAX of 3.7 amps.
3.7 A *
You cannot really make overall assumptions.
There are several limiting factors how much you can shove in a given
number of rack units:
* Total power consumption
* Total heat output (Can be ignored in many cases)
* Airflow direction, you often don't want to mix, depending on A/C
design (hot isle
54 matches
Mail list logo
