On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 01:57:01 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review for this proposed fix for
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8262108?
>>
>> As noted in a comment in that issue, the bug relates to the return value of
>> `Calendar.getDisplayNames` for the `Calendar.AM
> Can I please get a review for this proposed fix for
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8262108?
>
> As noted in a comment in that issue, the bug relates to the return value of
> `Calendar.getDisplayNames` for the `Calendar.AM_PM` field. The implementation
> has started returning inval
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:01:10 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Update existing NarrowNamesTest to match expectations
>> - Naoto's review suggestion
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/s
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:13:51 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the changes to support CLDR version 39. The vast majority of
> the changes are purely data changes from Unicode. The only change affected in
> logic was in `CLDRLocaleProviderAdapter.java`, where it needed to deal with
> CLDR'
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:13:51 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the changes to support CLDR version 39. The vast majority of
> the changes are purely data changes from Unicode. The only change affected in
> logic was in `CLDRLocaleProviderAdapter.java`, where it needed to deal with
> CLDR'
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:13:51 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the changes to support CLDR version 39. The vast majority of
> the changes are purely data changes from Unicode. The only change affected in
> logic was in `CLDRLocaleProviderAdapter.java`, where it needed to deal with
> CLDR'
Please review the changes to support CLDR version 39. The vast majority of the
changes are purely data changes from Unicode. The only change affected in logic
was in `CLDRLocaleProviderAdapter.java`, where it needed to deal with CLDR's
Norwegian language code switch
(https://unicode-org.atlassi
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:14:55 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review for this proposed fix for
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8262108?
>>
>> As noted in a comment in that issue, the bug relates to the return value of
>> `Calendar.getDisplayNames` for the `Calendar.AM
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:14:55 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review for this proposed fix for
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8262108?
>>
>> As noted in a comment in that issue, the bug relates to the return value of
>> `Calendar.getDisplayNames` for the `Calendar.AM
> Can I please get a review for this proposed fix for
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8262108?
>
> As noted in a comment in that issue, the bug relates to the return value of
> `Calendar.getDisplayNames` for the `Calendar.AM_PM` field. The implementation
> has started returning inval
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:03:28 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review for this proposed fix for
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8262108?
>>
>> As noted in a comment in that issue, the bug relates to the return value of
>> `Calendar.getDisplayNames` for the `Calendar.AM
11 matches
Mail list logo
