> Can I please get a review for this proposed fix for > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8262108? > > As noted in a comment in that issue, the bug relates to the return value of > `Calendar.getDisplayNames` for the `Calendar.AM_PM` field. The implementation > has started returning invalid values for the `AM_PM` field after the "day > period" support was added recently in the JDK as part of > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8262108. > > The commit here adds a check in the internal implementation of the display > name handling logic, to special case the `AM_PM` field and properly convert > the display name array indexes (which is an internal detail) to valid values > that represent the `AM_PM` calendar field. > > The commit also has a new jtreg test case `CalendarDisplayNamesTest` > reproduces this issue and verifies the fix. > > After this fix was introduced, I ran the test in > `test/jdk/java/util/Calendar/` and that showed up a failure in an existing > test case `NarrowNamesTest`. Looking at that test case, IMO, the current > testing in that `NarrowNamesTest` is incorrect and is probably what hid this > issue in the first place? To fix this, I have added an additional commit > which updates this test case to properly test the `AM_PM` field values.
Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision: - Update existing NarrowNamesTest to match expectations - Naoto's review suggestion ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3463/files - new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3463/files/84b11879..e7194733 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=3463&range=02 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=3463&range=01-02 Stats: 33 lines in 2 files changed: 12 ins; 6 del; 15 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3463.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3463/head:pull/3463 PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3463
