Re: [9] RFR: 8075548: SimpleDateFormat formatting of "LLLL" in English is incorrect; should be identical to "MMMM"

2015-03-27 Thread Naoto Sato
Hi Martin, I am not a Calendar expert, but I'd think if a query for narrow names fails, in some cases it would be useful not to fall back to longer names, say weekday names in chinese, 星期一..星期五or something like that. If they were mistakenly displayed at the calendar title row, it could all di

Re: [9] RFR: 8075548: SimpleDateFormat formatting of "LLLL" in English is incorrect; should be identical to "MMMM"

2015-03-27 Thread Martin Buchholz
Don't know much about Calendar, but: do you want below to try fallback twice? Eg. if it's still null after trying toStandaloneStyle(style), do you want to also try fallback to getBaseStyle(style) ? 2093 // Perform fallback here to follow the CLDR rules2094 if (val == null

[9] RFR: 8075548: SimpleDateFormat formatting of "LLLL" in English is incorrect; should be identical to "MMMM"

2015-03-27 Thread Masayoshi Okutsu
Hi, Please review the fix for 8075548. This change is to follow the fallback rules of the format-standalone names specified by the alias tag in CLDR. Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075548 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/9/8075548/webrev.00 Thanks, Masayoshi