Hi Juergen!
> Maybe a hint could be added to pod to clarify the behavior of
> default_empty_value ... I spoke to other developers and they also
> misunderstood it :)
I just patched H::F::Element::_Field.pm POD in trunk to better clear this
situation. I also adding something regarding it on the
2008/10/31 Dermot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/10/31 Carl Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> You're using auto_fieldset - so get_elements() will only return the
>> top-level fieldset - nothing else.
>
> That twice you've mention auto_fields in replies to me.
That's because you're using it in the YAML
2008/10/31 Carl Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/10/31 Dermot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi,
>> Is there something wrong with the snippet/yml file below?
>
> several things :)
>
>> ...
>> else {
>>my @types = keys %fileTypes;
>>$c->log->debug("Types ",join ', ', @types);
>>my $select =
2008/10/31 Dermot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I struggle with the get_element method and in the past have fallen
> back on the get_all_elements method. Perhaps someone can spot where I
> am going wrong. In the snippets below I always receive an "Can't call
> method "options" on an undefined" val
Hi,
I struggle with the get_element method and in the past have fallen
back on the get_all_elements method. Perhaps someone can spot where I
am going wrong. In the snippets below I always receive an "Can't call
method "options" on an undefined" value error
Is there something wrong with the snippe
Am Freitag 31 Oktober 2008 10:23:29 schrieb Carl Franks:
> 2008/10/31 Michele Beltrame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi Juergen!
> >
> >> 3. add the suggested "default_if_unchecked" to formfu
> >
> > On secondo thought, this might not be a good idea. A checkbox, by
> > definition, doesn't have a value i
2008/10/31 Michele Beltrame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Juergen!
>
>> 3. add the suggested "default_if_unchecked" to formfu
>
> On secondo thought, this might not be a good idea. A checkbox, by
> definition, doesn't have a value if unchecked. If you have a:
>
>
>
> it's either "1" or nothing at all
Hi Juergen!
> 3. add the suggested "default_if_unchecked" to formfu
On secondo thought, this might not be a good idea. A checkbox, by
definition, doesn't have a value if unchecked. If you have a:
it's either "1" or nothing at all (undefined). The "empty_if_unchecked"
thing is useful for testin
Am Freitag 31 Oktober 2008 09:47:39 schrieb Carl Franks:
> 2008/10/31 Juergen Mathwich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi Michele
> >
> > Thanks for your reply.
> >
> > I read following information from this thread
> > http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/html-formfu/2008-August/001334.html
> >
> >> If you'
2008/10/31 Juergen Mathwich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Michele
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I read following information from this thread
> http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/html-formfu/2008-August/001334.html
>
>> If you're using hand-rolled code to update the database - be aware
>> that the bro
Hi Michele
Thanks for your reply.
I read following information from this thread
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/html-formfu/2008-August/001334.html
> If you're using hand-rolled code to update the database - be aware
> that the browser doesn't send anything back for unchecked checkboxes -
>
Hi Juergen!
> shows me that it is empty, not 0 as expected:
>
> 'ACTIVE' => '',
I think this is the expected behaviour: the field is empty as opposed to
undefined. If you want it become 0 you could add a transformer to your
checkboxes.
Or, maybe, default_empty_value could b
12 matches
Mail list logo
