Am Freitag 31 Oktober 2008 09:47:39 schrieb Carl Franks: > 2008/10/31 Juergen Mathwich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi Michele > > > > Thanks for your reply. > > > > I read following information from this thread > > http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/html-formfu/2008-August/001334.html > > > >> If you're using hand-rolled code to update the database - be aware > >> that the browser doesn't send anything back for unchecked checkboxes - > >> not even an empty value - so either your db-update code will need to > >> check the FormFu form object for checkboxes that haven't been > >> submitted, or you'll need to use 'default_empty_value'. > >> > >> Carl > > > > This is why i *thought* default_empty_value should set it to "0" (the > > default value) if used. > > > > Regarding your reply I missunderstood the behavior - default_empty_value > > causes process() to add the key to the hash if the box isn't checked, but > > not to set a default value. > > > > Possible solutions are: > > > > 1. run through the result and set unset checkbox values to 0 > > 2. use transformers (like you suggested) > > 3. add the suggested "default_if_unchecked" to formfu > > Are you using HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC ? > As long as DBIC is told the field corresponding to the checkbox is not > nullable, it'll take care of this for you, and set it to zero. > > Carl > > _______________________________________________ > HTML-FormFu mailing list > HTML-FormFu@lists.scsys.co.uk > http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
Nope, I have to handle the data myself and can't use DBIC here. Juergen _______________________________________________ HTML-FormFu mailing list HTML-FormFu@lists.scsys.co.uk http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
