On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> On 19 October 2016 at 10:44, Yoann Rodiere wrote:
> > About backward compatibility, I guess there are two options:
> >
> >- If the last released version of the artifact used to contain only
> the
> >embedded mode, we can use mave
On 21 October 2016 at 12:20, Guillaume Smet
wrote:
> I always prefer to migrate early to the right solution when there is a
> compelling reason to do so and a clear logic in it.
I totally agree with that, but I think it's more about what we promised to
users than about what we think is the best
To be more clear... I just meant that to date we have not discussed any
plans for supporting java.sql.SQLType, not that we discussed it and decided
not to support it.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:27 PM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:29 PM Jordan Gigov wrote:
>
> I've been read
Doh! I inadvertently pushed some Hibernate ORM tags used for EAP to the
community server. I'm in the process of deleting them.
Regards,
Gail
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-d
