Do you have more info on these failures?
On Mar 9, 2012, at 7:01 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Yaay! It ony took slightly over 5 minutes today. But of course:
>
>> Building > :hibernate-infinispan:test > Resolving dependencies
>> ':hibernate-infinispan:test:hibernate-infinispan:test
> Test
> o
I think we should use classloading service to load it
yes, a HHH would be great.
-
Best Regards,
Strong Liu
http://about.me/stliu/bio
On Mar 13, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Scott Marlow wrote:
> Should Hibernate 4.x use the AvailableSettings.APP_CLASSLOADER to load
> JDBC driver
Its just more of the same "sometimes they pass, sometimes they fail".
On Tue 13 Mar 2012 03:44:25 AM CDT, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> Do you have more info on these failures?
>
> On Mar 9, 2012, at 7:01 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
>> Yaay! It ony took slightly over 5 minutes today. But of course:
Is it koser to deploy JDBC drivers with an app? I thought the general
suggestion was to make them available to the server classpath?
On Tue 13 Mar 2012 06:47:14 AM CDT, Strong Liu wrote:
> I think we should use classloading service to load it
>
> yes, a HHH would be great.
> ---
from the post, it seems either deploy jdbc driver within war or deploy the
driver as module, hibernate fails to find it
-
Best Regards,
Strong Liu
http://about.me/stliu/bio
On Mar 13, 2012, at 8:51 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Is it koser to deploy JDBC drivers with an a
I agree that its only a problem when the JDBC driver is not on the
server classpath (AS7 has "Global Modules" that allows for that as a
last resort option).
I think it is always better to have the JDBC drivers be available
globally. However, it doesn't matter which approach is used for these
Sure we can make a change like that. Like I said, just trying to make
sure this deployment setup is not frowned upon by AS.
On Tue 13 Mar 2012 08:43:12 AM CDT, Scott Marlow wrote:
> I agree that its only a problem when the JDBC driver is not on the
> server classpath (AS7 has "Global Modules" t
Hello,
About unit tests during the development phase on OGM-mongodb, I'm wondering
what is the best way.
Actually, I've developped some specific tests (CRUD mainly) because I was
not aware of the existing test suite. So my question is: should I remove
all my tests and just use core test or should
Hi all,
I have pushed the early draft we have been discussion for a while now to the
JCP. I also put a copy in the open. Check out http://goo.gl/FlAuQ
It contains main TODOs I would like your opinion on. But that's a significant
work that moves dependency injection and method-levle validation fo
I created HHH-7169 for this.
On 03/13/2012 11:26 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Sure we can make a change like that. Like I said, just trying to make
> sure this deployment setup is not frowned upon by AS.
>
> On Tue 13 Mar 2012 08:43:12 AM CDT, Scott Marlow wrote:
>> I agree that its only a problem
ok, I'll get to it later today hopefully
On Tue 13 Mar 2012 12:50:37 PM CDT, Scott Marlow wrote:
> I created HHH-7169 for this.
>
> On 03/13/2012 11:26 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>> Sure we can make a change like that. Like I said, just trying to make
>> sure this deployment setup is not frowned up
Hi,
I'm answering inline:
On 13 March 2012 16:39, Guillaume SCHEIBEL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> About unit tests during the development phase on OGM-mongodb, I'm wondering
> what is the best way.
> Actually, I've developped some specific tests (CRUD mainly) because I was
> not aware of the existing test
On 13 mars 2012, at 20:19, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm answering inline:
>
> On 13 March 2012 16:39, Guillaume SCHEIBEL
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> About unit tests during the development phase on OGM-mongodb, I'm wondering
>> what is the best way.
>> Actually, I've developped some specif
Can someone verify I am not off my rocker here? Re :
https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-7161
We have a case where Session defines a method that returns a public
interface org.hibernate.IdentifierLoadAccess. When SessionImpl
implements those methods it redefines the return to instead be a
Hi,
I see it the same way as you do; narrowing down the return type in the
implementation class shouldn't be a problem.
I'm also getting no compilation error when compiling the user's code
(as you said, IdentifierLoadAccessImpl shouldn't even be visible at
the call site). Maybe it's a problem wit
Hi Hardy,
Any feedback about this issue?
Thanks.
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Guillaume Smet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While working on Hibernate JPA Modelgen, I noticed that there are test
> failures in MixedConfigurationTest . I thought it was because of my
> own changes but I also have this probl
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> As I understood it, when accessed through the Session interface what
> return type is defined by SessionImpl is irrelevant. And indeed I am
> not able to reproduce this when access those methods via Session. My
> IDE gives me e
17 matches
Mail list logo
