2013/9/4 Hardy Ferentschik
>
> On 3 Jan 2013, at 4:10 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
> wrote:
>
> > Something like c makes sense.
> > It similar to the notion of converter in JPA.
> >
> > But why not the following style of interfaces
> >
> >interface Convert {
> >To convert(From);
> >}
>
>
On 3 Jan 2013, at 4:10 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> Something like c makes sense.
> It similar to the notion of converter in JPA.
>
> But why not the following style of interfaces
>
>interface Convert {
>To convert(From);
>}
Going back to Emmanuel mentioning @Convert. I am
> Another use case may be Optional from JDK 8:
>
> @Size(min = 5)
> Optional name;
Is another upcoming change not "type annotations" which would allow
Optional<@Size(min = 5) String>? That would of course be the preferable
solution.
--hardy
2013/9/4 Emmanuel Bernard
> On Wed 2013-09-04 9:26, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> > 2013/9/4 Emmanuel Bernard
> >
> > > On Wed 2013-09-04 8:27, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> > > > 2013/9/3 Emmanuel Bernard
> > > >
> > > > > Something like c makes sense.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
On Wed 2013-09-04 9:26, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> 2013/9/4 Emmanuel Bernard
>
> > On Wed 2013-09-04 8:27, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> > > 2013/9/3 Emmanuel Bernard
> > >
> > > > Something like c makes sense.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ok.
> > >
> > >
> > > > It similar to the notion of converter in JPA.
>
2013/9/4 Emmanuel Bernard
> On Wed 2013-09-04 8:27, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> > 2013/9/3 Emmanuel Bernard
> >
> > > Something like c makes sense.
> > >
> >
> > Ok.
> >
> >
> > > It similar to the notion of converter in JPA.
> > >
> > > But why not the following style of interfaces
> > >
> > >
2013/9/4 Gunnar Morling
> (using correct list now)
>
>
> 2013/9/3 Hardy Ferentschik
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3 Sep 2013, at 15:58, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Yesterday George Gastaldi from the Forge team approached me regarding
>> the
>> > application of constraints to "wrapped" pro
On Wed 2013-09-04 8:27, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> 2013/9/3 Emmanuel Bernard
>
> > Something like c makes sense.
> >
>
> Ok.
>
>
> > It similar to the notion of converter in JPA.
> >
> > But why not the following style of interfaces
> >
> > interface Convert {
> > To convert(From);
>
(using correct list now)
2013/9/3 Hardy Ferentschik
>
>
>
>
> On 3 Sep 2013, at 15:58, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yesterday George Gastaldi from the Forge team approached me regarding the
> > application of constraints to "wrapped" properties. Their situation is
> the
> > followin
2013/9/3 Emmanuel Bernard
> Something like c makes sense.
>
Ok.
> It similar to the notion of converter in JPA.
>
> But why not the following style of interfaces
>
> interface Convert {
> To convert(From);
> }
>
Yes, thinking more about it, it probably makes sense to support m
Something like c makes sense.
It similar to the notion of converter in JPA.
But why not the following style of interfaces
interface Convert {
To convert(From);
}
On Tue 2013-09-03 15:58, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday George Gastaldi from the Forge team approached me
11 matches
Mail list logo
