On 3 Jan 2013, at 4:10 PM, Emmanuel Bernard <emman...@hibernate.org> wrote:
> Something like c makes sense. > It similar to the notion of converter in JPA. > > But why not the following style of interfaces > > interface Convert<From,To> { > To convert(From); > } Going back to Emmanuel mentioning @Convert. I am wondering whether using explicit annotations would not be more appropriate than an SPI? It would of course be more verbose, but maybe the "converter" annotation could be applied on class level as well. The concern for me is really the ambiguity @Size(min=3, max=10) UIInput<String> name; introduces. What if @Null or @NotNull is used. Does it apply to the String or the UIInput instance. It is not apparent anymore from the annotations what is targeted. We already started introducing ambiguous cases in Bean Validation with method validation (cross parameter constraints, exclusion from getters from validated methods), I am not sure we should continue on this path. Does the gain we achieve via the proposed SPI outweigh introducing even more border cases? --Hardy _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev