2014-03-31 18:28 GMT+02:00 Sanne Grinovero :
> On 31 March 2014 15:33, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hibernate-dev/2013-February/009426.html
>
> Thanks Steve. So I guess that settles it for OGM as well?
>
IIRC, the situation back then was a bit different. The JPA JAR
On 31 March 2014 15:33, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hibernate-dev/2013-February/009426.html
Thanks Steve. So I guess that settles it for OGM as well?
(Removed all people from CC as we're changing subject)
-- Sanne
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Gunnar Morlin
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hibernate-dev/2013-February/009426.html
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> 2014-03-31 12:08 GMT+02:00 Sanne Grinovero :
>
> > Since Hibernate OGM is now an implementation of JPA 2.1, doesn't it
> > already require Java 7?
> >
>
> Good point;
2014-03-31 12:08 GMT+02:00 Sanne Grinovero :
> Since Hibernate OGM is now an implementation of JPA 2.1, doesn't it
> already require Java 7?
>
Good point; Not sure whether JPA 2.1 per-se really requires Java 7, but I
understand as an implementation we'd be "allowed" to require Java 7 as per
the s
Since Hibernate OGM is now an implementation of JPA 2.1, doesn't it
already require Java 7?
You could also decide to use Java7 for the build but not necessarily
make use of Java7 features, as Search is an optional dependency. (but
I also don't see a problem on moving).
I would like to encourage O
+1
One potential issue coming to mind is that this will require Hibernate OGM
users to work with Java 7 as well (at least when using queries via
Hibernate Search).
When discussing the issue (for OGM) last time, we decided to stick to Java
6 to ease OGM experiments of existing Hibernate ORM users.
+100
On 20 Jan 2014, at 16:21, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> The next minor release of Apache Lucene v. 4.8 will require Java7.
>
> The Lucene team has highlighted many good reasons for that, including
> some excellent improvements in sorting performance and reliability of
> IO operations: nice thin
Note this would affect only our upcoming Hibernate Search 5.0: it's a
major release which breaks some backwards compatibility anyway. I
guess that blasts any remaining concern?
For the purpose of WFK users in maintenance mode I'll expect them to
stay on previous Search version, on which we'll back
On Thu 20 Mar 2014 11:21:23 AM EDT, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> The next minor release of Apache Lucene v. 4.8 will require Java7.
>
> The Lucene team has highlighted many good reasons for that, including
> some excellent improvements in sorting performance and reliability of
> IO operations: nice thi
The next minor release of Apache Lucene v. 4.8 will require Java7.
The Lucene team has highlighted many good reasons for that, including
some excellent improvements in sorting performance and reliability of
IO operations: nice things we'd like to take advantage of.
Objections against baseling Hib
10 matches
Mail list logo
