On 31 March 2014 15:33, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote: > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hibernate-dev/2013-February/009426.html
Thanks Steve. So I guess that settles it for OGM as well? (Removed all people from CC as we're changing subject) -- Sanne > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> > wrote: >> >> 2014-03-31 12:08 GMT+02:00 Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org>: >> >> > Since Hibernate OGM is now an implementation of JPA 2.1, doesn't it >> > already require Java 7? >> > >> >> Good point; Not sure whether JPA 2.1 per-se really requires Java 7, but I >> understand as an implementation we'd be "allowed" to require Java 7 as per >> the spec guidelines. So far, 6 seemed sufficient for our purposes. >> >> You could also decide to use Java7 for the build but not necessarily >> > make use of Java7 features, as Search is an optional dependency. (but >> > I also don't see a problem on moving). >> > >> >> Yes, I thought about this as well, but it makes a difficult story to >> explain (depending on whether you use JP-QL or not, and depending on the >> backend you use, you may be use Java 6 or 7). I'd rather move to 7 >> altogether then and keep things a bit simpler. >> >> > >> > I would like to encourage OGM to switch to Search 5 soon though: the >> > HQL parser is aligning already, and some features we're working on in >> > Search are meant to improve the user experience for OGM users >> > specifically (HSEARCH-1119), not least it's the version meant for >> > Infinispan 7, which OGM will need to support a GridDialect over >> > HotRod. And solid performance improvements as usual ;-) >> > >> >> +1 :-) >> >> >> > >> > -- Sanne >> > >> > On 31 March 2014 10:40, Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> wrote: >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > One potential issue coming to mind is that this will require Hibernate >> > OGM >> > > users to work with Java 7 as well (at least when using queries via >> > Hibernate >> > > Search). >> > > >> > > When discussing the issue (for OGM) last time, we decided to stick to >> > Java 6 >> > > to ease OGM experiments of existing Hibernate ORM users. Personally I >> > don't >> > > think it's a problem, (I had wished to move OGM to Java 7 before), >> > > just >> > > pointing out the fact so that there are no surprises. >> > > >> > > So once we upgrade OGM to HSEARCH 5.x, I'd then make use of Java 7 >> > features >> > > in OGM as well. >> > > >> > > --Gunnar >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > 2014-03-20 19:20 GMT+01:00 Hardy Ferentschik <ha...@hibernate.org>: >> > > >> > >> +100 >> > >> >> > >> On 20 Jan 2014, at 16:21, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > The next minor release of Apache Lucene v. 4.8 will require Java7. >> > >> > >> > >> > The Lucene team has highlighted many good reasons for that, >> > >> > including >> > >> > some excellent improvements in sorting performance and reliability >> > >> > of >> > >> > IO operations: nice things we'd like to take advantage of. >> > >> > >> > >> > Objections against baseling Hibernate Search 5 to *require* Java7 >> > >> > too? >> > >> > We hardly have a choice, so objections better be good ;-) >> > >> > >> > >> > -- Sanne >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > >> > hibernate-dev mailing list >> > >> > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> > >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> > >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> > >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> > > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
