I've been reviewing the differences in APIs/SPIs for 5.0 vs 5.1. They are
primarily changes in SPI (which is OK), but there are a couple of changes
that I need to investigate further to ensure they won't affect
applications. I don't see anything insurmountable at this point. If
necessary, I think w
5.0.10 and 5.1.1 needed to be delayed while we dealt with a critical bug,
HHH-10795. I am also working with John O'Hara to fix a performance
regression that was introduced into 5.0.10 and, presumably, would be in
5.1.1.
Another reason I've been holding off on releasing 5.1.1 was because of the
fai
ORM 5.1, has an improvement for how we interact with CDI, that I really
want to finish coding the WildFly side of, so I feel the *pain* of not
having this yet.
On 08/11/2016 02:04 PM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
>> As part of bringing ORM 5.1.1+ into WF 10.1 or 11, we need to first
>> en
Hi Scott,
> As part of bringing ORM 5.1.1+ into WF 10.1 or 11, we need to first
> ensure that ORM 5.1.1 is completely *compatible* with ORM 5.0.x.
How does this ensuring look like? Is passing the WF test suite enough, or
are there further criteria? If identifying changes to the API is what you
ar
On 08/11/2016 10:45 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 11 August 2016 at 15:19, Scott Marlow wrote:
>>
>> On 08/11/2016 06:19 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>>
>>> I've been watching this:
>>> - https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/8984
>>>
>>> And that's the reason I've been asking for a 5.1 rele
On 11 August 2016 at 15:19, Scott Marlow wrote:
>
> On 08/11/2016 06:19 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>
>> I've been watching this:
>> - https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/8984
>>
>> And that's the reason I've been asking for a 5.1 release, as it has
>> been blocked by issues for long.
>>
>> I
On 08/11/2016 06:19 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> I've been watching this:
> - https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/8984
>
> And that's the reason I've been asking for a 5.1 release, as it has
> been blocked by issues for long.
>
> Indeed if this wasn't being tracked for 10.1 that's sad as we n
Hi Gunnar,
I'm not against ORM 5.1.1 being included in WildFly 10.1, but it is more
likely to be in WildFly 11, since WildFly 10.1 is likely to be released
before ORM 5.1.1.
Scott
On 08/11/2016 03:23 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi Scott, all,
>
> Are there any plans to upgrade ORM in the WF 10
I've been watching this:
- https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/8984
And that's the reason I've been asking for a 5.1 release, as it has
been blocked by issues for long.
Indeed if this wasn't being tracked for 10.1 that's sad as we need
WildFly releases with up to date versions of ORM to make
Ah, OK. I was confusing WildFly 10.1 with 11. I'm not sure about the
version for 10.1.
Scott?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Martin Simka wrote:
> Hi Gail,
>
> are you sure? I'm only aware of WFLY-6930 (Upgrade Hibernate to 5.0.10)
> and I'm not sure if it makes it to 10.1. Then there is WFLY
Hi Gail,
are you sure? I'm only aware of WFLY-6930 (Upgrade Hibernate to 5.0.10) and
I'm not sure if it makes it to 10.1. Then there is WFLY-6854 (Upgrade
Hibernate ORM to 5.1.x) which is targeted to WildFly 11.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6930
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6854
Hi Gunnar,
10.1 will use ORM 5.1.
Regards,
Gail
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Gunnar Morling
wrote:
> Hi Scott, all,
>
> Are there any plans to upgrade ORM in the WF 10.1 release?
>
> I somehow assumed that 10.1 would come with ORM 5.1, but it's still using
> 5.0.9. At least 5.0.10 would b
Hi Scott, all,
Are there any plans to upgrade ORM in the WF 10.1 release?
I somehow assumed that 10.1 would come with ORM 5.1, but it's still using
5.0.9. At least 5.0.10 would be nice if 5.1 cannot be done for some reasons.
Thanks,
--Gunnar
___
hiber
13 matches
Mail list logo
