On 08/11/2016 10:45 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > On 11 August 2016 at 15:19, Scott Marlow <smar...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 08/11/2016 06:19 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >>> >>> I've been watching this: >>> - https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/8984 >>> >>> And that's the reason I've been asking for a 5.1 release, as it has >>> been blocked by issues for long. >>> >>> Indeed if this wasn't being tracked for 10.1 that's sad as we need >>> WildFly releases with up to date versions of ORM to make better >>> progress on OGM and Search, I'm sorry if this wasn't clear but the PR >>> has been open for a while, as was the agreement among us that we'd aim >>> to have ORM 5.1 in the next WildFly version. >> >> >> The WildFly master branch is now for WildFly 11. Could Search/OGM align >> with WF11 instead of 10.1, as the >> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/8984 is finally passing, which is a >> good sign that ORM 5.1.1.Final will likely pass the WildFly test suite, and >> then get merged. > > Hi Scott, > if you could make sure that WF 10.1 had ORM 5.1.1+ that would greatly > help to have Search and OGM actually align. > > Since that PR is working fine (and the patch looks quite simple too!) > may I assume we just need to put a release together in ORM, while you > hold the WF train ? :) >
As part of bringing ORM 5.1.1+ into WF 10.1 or 11, we need to first ensure that ORM 5.1.1 is completely *compatible* with ORM 5.0.x. Once we know that, we should be ready for the (https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/8984) merge. > Thanks, > Sanne > >> >> >>> >>> I guess it wasn't clear "which" version is "next", but if we could fix >>> this for 10.1 that would be very nice, and match the decision of the >>> platform architects. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sanne >>> >>> >>> On 11 August 2016 at 10:18, Gail Badner <gbad...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ah, OK. I was confusing WildFly 10.1 with 11. I'm not sure about the >>>> version for 10.1. >>>> >>>> Scott? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Martin Simka <msi...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Gail, >>>>> >>>>> are you sure? I'm only aware of WFLY-6930 (Upgrade Hibernate to 5.0.10) >>>>> and I'm not sure if it makes it to 10.1. Then there is WFLY-6854 >>>>> (Upgrade >>>>> Hibernate ORM to 5.1.x) which is targeted to WildFly 11. >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6930 >>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6854 >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Gail Badner <gbad...@redhat.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Gunnar, >>>>>> >>>>>> 10.1 will use ORM 5.1. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Gail >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Scott, all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are there any plans to upgrade ORM in the WF 10.1 release? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I somehow assumed that 10.1 would come with ORM 5.1, but it's still >>>>>> >>>>>> using >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 5.0.9. At least 5.0.10 would be nice if 5.1 cannot be done for some >>>>>>> reasons. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --Gunnar >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>>>>>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>>>>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>> >> _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
