Hi Steve,
I just pulled and did ./gradlew install. Unfortunately this didn't install
the jars in my local maven repo because the maven plugin declaration was
missing (you might want to consider adding it). Anyways, after I added it
the jars were installed in my repo. I ran schema export and the sc
Ok Petar, when you get a chance pull and give that a try wrt ForeignKeys
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I am working on it as we speak :)
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Petar Tahchiev
> wrote:
>
>> Cool,
>>
>> ping me once resolved - I'm eager to test it :)
>>
>> 2
I am working on it as we speak :)
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Petar Tahchiev
wrote:
> Cool,
>
> ping me once resolved - I'm eager to test it :)
>
> 2015-04-02 21:57 GMT+03:00 Steve Ebersole :
>
>> Petar, so I was unfortunately remembering the work done for 6.0 when
>> saying that wrt the FK
Cool,
ping me once resolved - I'm eager to test it :)
2015-04-02 21:57 GMT+03:00 Steve Ebersole :
> Petar, so I was unfortunately remembering the work done for 6.0 when
> saying that wrt the FK name. What I found is that binding support for JPA
> @FK is, lets say "spotty" at best:
> https://hib
When debugging, I see this -- it get "bbb" twice (old and new, where I would
actually expect stale "ccc"):
results = {java.util.ArrayList@17380} size = 3
0 = {java.lang.Object[3]@17384}
0 = {com.google.appengine.api.datastore.Key@17395} "test(1)"
1 = {java.lang.String@17396} "#Thu Apr 02 2
Petar, so I was unfortunately remembering the work done for 6.0 when saying
that wrt the FK name. What I found is that binding support for JPA @FK is,
lets say "spotty" at best: https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-9709
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Petar Tahchiev
wrote:
>
> OK, maybe
I just want the one that "works" :)
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> It also works with that task from JAXB Commons when updating the JAXB
> Commons libs (and JAXB itself). That task has the "target" parameter in
> newer versions. I can send you a PR for that update.
>
> 2
It is just the one used in almost every example I have ever seen. I really
have no idea why one is used versus another.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Had a quick look into (1).
>
> The "target" parameter is not supported by that version of the Ant task
> currently in u
It also works with that task from JAXB Commons when updating the JAXB
Commons libs (and JAXB itself). That task has the "target" parameter in
newer versions. I can send you a PR for that update.
2015-04-02 16:08 GMT+02:00 Gunnar Morling :
> Had a quick look into (1).
>
> The "target" parameter is
Had a quick look into (1).
The "target" parameter is not supported by that version of the Ant task
currently in use. If I change the class name of the Ant task from
"org.jvnet.jaxb2_commons.xjc.XJC2Task" into "com.sun.tools.xjc.XJC2Task",
the "target" parameter is recognized and setting it to "2.0
After considering this some more, I think moving to Java 8 as baseline is
just not reasonable yet. And tbh I just do not see a compelling reason to
move to Java 7 as the baseline. So if reasonably possible I would still
like to remain backwards compatible with Java 6.
The only hurdle I believe i
Steve,
I have pushed a proposal for HHH-9701 to:
https://github.com/johnaoahra80/hibernate-orm/tree/HHH-9701
There are a couple of areas that I would appreciate feedback;
1) Serialization/Deserialization - EntityEntries implementations can be
serialized and each implementation provide their ow
12 matches
Mail list logo
