Petar, so I was unfortunately remembering the work done for 6.0 when saying
that wrt the FK name. What I found is that binding support for JPA @FK is,
lets say "spotty" at best: https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-9709
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Petar Tahchiev <paranoia...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> OK, maybe I'm doing something wrong. I also tried setting the foreign key
> name to "none" like this:
>
> @ManyToMany(targetEntity = AbstractFilterModel.class, cascade = {
> CascadeType.PERSIST, CascadeType.MERGE, CascadeType.REFRESH }, fetch =
> FetchType.LAZY)
> @JoinTable(inverseJoinColumns = {
> @JoinColumn(unique = false, nullable = true,
> insertable = true, updatable = true, foreignKey = @ForeignKey(name =
> "none", value = ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), name = "filter_pk") },
> indexes = {
> @Index(unique = false, columnList = "entity_pk") },
> inverseForeignKey = @ForeignKey(name = "none", value =
> ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), foreignKey = @ForeignKey(name = "none",
> value = ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), joinColumns = {
> @JoinColumn(unique = false, nullable = true,
> insertable = true, updatable = true, foreignKey = @ForeignKey(name =
> "none", value = ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), name = "entity_pk") }, name
> = "entity_filters")
>
>
> it didn't help - the foreign keys are still generated. I prepared a sample
> project with 2 tests:
> 1) will try to create an entity and fail because of the foreign key
> 2) will export the schema.sql so you can see the foregin keys are still
> generated.
>
> Sample project is here: https://github.com/paranoiabla/HHH-8805
>
>
> 2015-04-01 14:36 GMT+03:00 Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org>:
>
>>
>> https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-8805?focusedCommentId=66093&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-66093
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> And no, we generally do not reopen issues from Closed state. And here,
>>> given the different branches, I'd be more inclined to create a different
>>> issue referencing the original.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hmm, it seems I inadvertently set the wrong fix version on HHH-8805.
>>>> It is fixed in our metamodel branch which is 6.0. I pulled the necessary
>>>> metamodel (org.hibernate.mapping) changes back to master (5.0), but only
>>>> the hbm.xml form of naming the FK "none" (magic value) is supported to
>>>> truly disable generation. For the time being you can use this as well from
>>>> annotations; just name the FK "none".
>>>>
>>>> If you can write some tests for this, it will make it easier for me to
>>>> implement.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Petar Tahchiev <paranoia...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh,
>>>>>
>>>>> and one last thing: I don't think this is fixed:
>>>>> https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-8805
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's my mapping:
>>>>>
>>>>> @ManyToMany(targetEntity = AbstractFilterModel.class, cascade = {
>>>>> CascadeType.PERSIST,
>>>>> CascadeType.MERGE,
>>>>> CascadeType.REFRESH
>>>>> }, fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
>>>>> @JoinTable(indexes = {
>>>>> @Index(unique = false, columnList = "entity_pk")
>>>>> }, inverseForeignKey = @ForeignKey(ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT),
>>>>> inverseJoinColumns = {
>>>>> @JoinColumn(unique = false, nullable = true, insertable =
>>>>> true, updatable = true, foreignKey =
>>>>> @ForeignKey(ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), name = "filter_pk")
>>>>> }, joinColumns = {
>>>>> @JoinColumn(unique = false, nullable = true, insertable =
>>>>> true, updatable = true, foreignKey =
>>>>> @ForeignKey(ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), name = "entity_pk")
>>>>> }, foreignKey = @ForeignKey(ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), name =
>>>>> "entity_filters")
>>>>> private Collection<AbstractFilterModelDefinition> filters;
>>>>>
>>>>> As you can see I have added ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT wherever it
>>>>> is possible to add it. However here's what the schema tool generates:
>>>>>
>>>>> create index IDX8b6xl4emqmow8hikaf4hgx9xn on entity_filters
>>>>> (entity_pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> alter table entity_filters
>>>>> add constraint FKra38l70n01disvkge7i9ff5ym
>>>>> foreign key (filter_pk)
>>>>> references abstract_filter (pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> alter table entity_filters
>>>>> add constraint FKderx50xtd0lkeeblrj3o0ipq9
>>>>> foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>> references stock_level (pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> alter table entity_filters
>>>>> add constraint FK7ery3yx4pg32ogvv1wpr150oq
>>>>> foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>> references content_slot (pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> alter table entity_filters
>>>>> add constraint FKse5m2mj7rrwj8ndimynfnr2px
>>>>> foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>> references blog_entry (pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> alter table entity_filters
>>>>> add constraint FK9nubqtdhrmefjv2a5oab2fcr2
>>>>> foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>> references price (pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> alter table entity_filters
>>>>> add constraint FKcsuwqm524wu4u41oatrcalxvh
>>>>> foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>> references tax (pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> alter table entity_filters
>>>>> add constraint FKmd3mm5pw9naa05ype38m6x1eo
>>>>> foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>> references abstract_template (pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> alter table entity_filters
>>>>> add constraint FKsx6vnh2tga70pkne44dnq8kp0
>>>>> foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>> references discount (pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> alter table entity_filters
>>>>> add constraint FK6yx2wc1w1yb6qa1cx4byv7mju
>>>>> foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>> references classification_feature (pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> alter table entity_filters
>>>>> add constraint FKpoh168do203hfqwb7so7c4c79
>>>>> foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>> references cms_navigation_node (pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> alter table entity_filters
>>>>> add constraint FKi85fkvbm7otl679ijlr6oyoff
>>>>> foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>> references product (pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> alter table entity_filters
>>>>> add constraint FKi8semxf3lq0n12lm05v7oydeq
>>>>> foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>> references abstract_page (pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> alter table entity_filters
>>>>> add constraint FKsjqo9a6quh1cg4y0wyqo4tp8b
>>>>> foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>> references promotion (pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> alter table entity_filters
>>>>> add constraint FKfw64whfl6vgbqehj20qmc39i3
>>>>> foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>> references simple_cms_widget (pk);
>>>>>
>>>>> The foreign keys are all different (in Hibernate 4.3.x they were the
>>>>> same), but I just don't want them. Shall I reopen the issue?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:32 GMT+03:00 Petar Tahchiev <paranoia...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> One other thing I noticed:
>>>>>> hibernate-core-5 depends on
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <groupId>org.jboss.logging</groupId>
>>>>>> <artifactId>jboss-logging</artifactId>
>>>>>> <version>3.2.1.Final</version>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and if you have hibernate-validator 5.1.3.Final (the last stable), it
>>>>>> will depend on
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <groupId>org.jboss.logging</groupId>
>>>>>> <artifactId>jboss-logging</artifactId>
>>>>>> <version>3.1.4.GA</version>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you will get an exception of method not found on some
>>>>>> jboss-logging API. I excluded the jboss-loggin from the
>>>>>> hibernate-validator
>>>>>> dependency, but now I get a ton of these TRACE statements (literally
>>>>>> every millisecond):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But at least it works.. I guess the only real solution is to have
>>>>>> hibernate-validator use the same jboss-logging version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2015-04-01 10:39 GMT+03:00 Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 2:21 GMT+02:00 Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > Just to clarify... I *think* that as long as we run the build
>>>>>>> with Java 8
>>>>>>> > and set the bootclasspath to 6 or 7 we should be fine.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, setting the boot classpath to 6 (or 7) makes sure you only use
>>>>>>> classes
>>>>>>> present in that JDK (be it explicitly or implicitly as in the
>>>>>>> ConcurrentHashMap case), because it's that class library which will
>>>>>>> be used
>>>>>>> for compilation then. It is cumbersome to use though as you need to
>>>>>>> specify
>>>>>>> the location of a 6 or 7 JDK which makes the build less easily
>>>>>>> portable
>>>>>>> between machines.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Currently, AnimalSniffer is in place to prevent this very category
>>>>>>> of error
>>>>>>> and I'm wondering why it didn't detect the "usage" of KeySetView. It
>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>> should have detected it, assuming it analyses the byte code of
>>>>>>> classes. But
>>>>>>> this makes me wonder now whether it only analyses the source code
>>>>>>> actually.
>>>>>>> Then it wouldn't be usable to prevent this sort of issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Coding against the ConcurrentMap interface is the best way to avoid
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> issue. But of course there is no guarantee that it happens again,
>>>>>>> unless
>>>>>>> e.g. having a build on CI which uses 6 or 7 on its boot classpath.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Steve Ebersole <
>>>>>>> st...@hibernate.org>
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > > Well the idea is to run the Gradle process with Java 8 (the
>>>>>>> build itself
>>>>>>> > > is a Java process too don't forget). We pass in the older JDK
>>>>>>> > specifically
>>>>>>> > > to be able to set the bootclasspath for compilation and the
>>>>>>> executable
>>>>>>> > for
>>>>>>> > > running tests. That's the theory.
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > Interestingly I developed a simplified project to test these
>>>>>>> theories:
>>>>>>> > > https://github.com/sebersole/gradle-mixed-jdk And of course
>>>>>>> this all
>>>>>>> > > works there. As you'd expect right?
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > I think the JAXB thing comes into play here as well. Gradle
>>>>>>> does not
>>>>>>> > have
>>>>>>> > > any XJC support built in, so we have to make use of its Ant
>>>>>>> support to
>>>>>>> > run
>>>>>>> > > the XJC Ant tasks for JAXB model generation. The problem there
>>>>>>> is that,
>>>>>>> > > afaik, there is no way to tell Gradle's AntBuilder to use a JDK
>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>> > than
>>>>>>> > > the one that launched Gradle. I think this is why we see a JAXB
>>>>>>> model
>>>>>>> > > defined for Java 7, rather than Java 6, because we essentially
>>>>>>> run XJC
>>>>>>> > with
>>>>>>> > > Java 8.
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > Anyway, this certainly makes the build more complex and we
>>>>>>> definitely
>>>>>>> > have
>>>>>>> > > to think through all these scenarios. In fact after Beta1, one
>>>>>>> of my
>>>>>>> > todos
>>>>>>> > > is to build up the build "from scratch" using that
>>>>>>> gradle-mixed-jdk
>>>>>>> > project
>>>>>>> > > as a basis.
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > In general the plan though is to run all the tests (other than
>>>>>>> > > hibernate-java8, obviously) with the "baseline JDK, whether that
>>>>>>> be Java
>>>>>>> > 6
>>>>>>> > > or 7.
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Sanne Grinovero <
>>>>>>> sa...@hibernate.org>
>>>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > >> There are many similar issues discussed on the Lucene
>>>>>>> developer's
>>>>>>> > >> mailing list, it's an interesting read:
>>>>>>> > >> -
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/201503.mbox/%3C07c401d06aba%240b477c80%2421d67580%24%40thetaphi.de%3E
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> > >> I see no alternative than to have those test jobs actually
>>>>>>> exercising
>>>>>>> > >> ORM with JDK6, or maybe even compile it all with JDK6 except
>>>>>>> the Java8
>>>>>>> > >> additional module to be compiled with JDK8 ?
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> > >> On 1 April 2015 at 00:36, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> > >> > Ahh, seems this may be an option to work around it:
>>>>>>> > >> >
>>>>>>> > >> > <quote>
>>>>>>> > >> > Using the general *Map* interface in place of the concrete
>>>>>>> > >> > *ConcurrentHashMap* type here side-steps the coupling to the
>>>>>>> Java 8
>>>>>>> > >> return
>>>>>>> > >> > type and will allow this code to be compiled with Java 8 and
>>>>>>> run on
>>>>>>> > >> Java 7.
>>>>>>> > >> > </quote>
>>>>>>> > >> >
>>>>>>> > >> > I had missed that part.
>>>>>>> > >> >
>>>>>>> > >> >
>>>>>>> > >> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Steve Ebersole <
>>>>>>> st...@hibernate.org>
>>>>>>> > >> wrote:
>>>>>>> > >> >
>>>>>>> > >> >> When I say "internal" here, I mean internal to java classes.
>>>>>>> > >> >>
>>>>>>> > >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Steve Ebersole <
>>>>>>> st...@hibernate.org
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > >> >> wrote:
>>>>>>> > >> >>
>>>>>>> > >> >>> Nope. It just effects any code compiled with Java 8 even
>>>>>>> though the
>>>>>>> > >> >>> change is internal. The problem is the generated bytecode
>>>>>>> > >> incorporates
>>>>>>> > >> >>> this change. Like I said, this should be compiled with 1.6
>>>>>>> > >> compatibility,
>>>>>>> > >> >>> but that is apparently not working atm. I am having a
>>>>>>> struggle
>>>>>>> > >> getting a
>>>>>>> > >> >>> mixed JDK build working "just right".
>>>>>>> > >> >>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Petar Tahchiev <
>>>>>>> > >> paranoia...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> > >> >>> wrote:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>> According to this:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>> https://gist.github.com/AlainODea/1375759b8720a3f9f094
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>> Notably the Java 1.7 *ConcurrentHashMap#keySet()* returns
>>>>>>> a Set<K>
>>>>>>> > >> while
>>>>>>> > >> >>>> the 1.8*ConcurrentHashMap#keySet()* returns a
>>>>>>> > >> >>>> ConcurrentHashMap.KeySetView<K,V>`.
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>> I think you're using some Java8 API.
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>> 2015-04-01 2:25 GMT+03:00 Petar Tahchiev <
>>>>>>> paranoia...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> petar@petar-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon:~$ java -version
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> java version "1.7.0_71"
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_71-b14)
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.71-b01, mixed
>>>>>>> mode)
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> petar@petar-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon:~$ uname -a
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> Linux petar-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon 3.16.0-33-generic
>>>>>>> #44-Ubuntu SMP
>>>>>>> > Thu
>>>>>>> > >> Mar
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> 12 12:19:35 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> petar@petar-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon:~$
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> 2015-04-01 2:21 GMT+03:00 Steve Ebersole <
>>>>>>> st...@hibernate.org>:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> What JRE are you trying to use? This error:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.util.concurrent.
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> ConcurrentHashMap.keySet()Ljava/util/concurrent/
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> ConcurrentHashMap$KeySetView;
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> is indicative of an issue in cross-jre support due to a
>>>>>>> change
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> internal to java classes.
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Petar Tahchiev <
>>>>>>> > >> paranoia...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Thanks Steve,
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> I managed to migrate my configuration to the new
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> MetamodelImplementor. Now when I run the scema export I
>>>>>>> get a
>>>>>>> > lot
>>>>>>> > >> of these
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> warning:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> INFO : HHH000400: Using dialect:
>>>>>>> > >> org.hibernate.dialect.MySQL5Dialect
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : JDBC Driver reports it stores quoted identifiers
>>>>>>> in both
>>>>>>> > >> mixed
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> and upper case
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : HHH000072: Duplicate joins for class:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> com.xxx.platform.core.model.cms.AbstractPageModel
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : HHH000072: Duplicate joins for class:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> com.xxx.platform.module.invoice.core.model.InvoicePageModel
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : HHH000072: Duplicate joins for class:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> com.xxx.platform.core.model.batch.BatchStepExecutionContextModel
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : HHH000072: Duplicate joins for class:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> com.xxx.platform.core.model.batch.BatchJobExecutionContextModel
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : HHH000072: Duplicate joins for class:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> com.xxx.platform.module.search.core.model.SearchKeywordRedirectModel
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : HHH000072: Duplicate joins for class:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > com.xxx.platform.module.search.core.model.SearchPageRedirectModel
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : HHH000072: Duplicate joins for class:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> com.xxx.platform.module.promotion.core.model.PromotionModel
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> and when I run some test I get the following exception:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.keySet()Ljava/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap$KeySetView;
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> org.hibernate.internal.SessionFactoryImpl.iterateEntityNameResolvers(SessionFactoryImpl.java:733)
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl$CoordinatingEntityNameResolver.resolveEntityName(SessionImpl.java:2470)
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl.guessEntityName(SessionImpl.java:1992)
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl.getEntityPersister(SessionImpl.java:1485)
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultMergeEventListener.onMerge(DefaultMergeEventListener.java:163)
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultMergeEventListener.onMerge(DefaultMergeEventListener.java:85)
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl.fireMerge(SessionImpl.java:882)
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> > >> org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl.merge(SessionImpl.java:864)
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> > >> org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl.merge(SessionImpl.java:869)
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> org.hibernate.jpa.spi.AbstractEntityManagerImpl.merge(AbstractEntityManagerImpl.java:1196)
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> org.springframework.batch.item.database.JpaItemWriter.doWrite(JpaItemWriter.java:104)
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> org.springframework.batch.item.database.JpaItemWriter.write(JpaItemWriter.java:83)
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> 2015-04-01 1:23 GMT+03:00 Steve Ebersole <
>>>>>>> st...@hibernate.org>:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> I am told that the bug does not affect the
>>>>>>> JBoss->Central sync
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> process. So at some point the artifacts should all be
>>>>>>> > available
>>>>>>> > >> in Central
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Steve Ebersole <
>>>>>>> > >> st...@hibernate.org
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> hibernate-core seems to be the only artifact that is
>>>>>>> available
>>>>>>> > >> in
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> JBoss Nexus.
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Steve Ebersole <
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> st...@hibernate.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> So apparently the artifacts / repo issue is a Nexus
>>>>>>> bug that
>>>>>>> > is
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> effecting the JBoss repo (and therefore us)...
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> http://issues.sonatype.org/browse/NEXUS-7654
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> As I pointed out in the announcement, I am managing
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> > >> "migration
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> guide" in source repo while I develop the Betas. See
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/blob/master/working-5.0-migration-guide.md
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> As far are the new bootstrapping apis, see
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/5.0/topical/html/bootstrap/NativeBootstrapping.html
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/5.0/topical/html/bootstrap/LegacyBootstrapping.html
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Petar Tahchiev <
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> paranoia...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> I just tried the latest beta and I cannot compile my
>>>>>>> > project.
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> With the
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> latest hibernate 4.3.X I was able to do this:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> final org.hibernate.cfg.Configuration
>>>>>>> configuration
>>>>>>> > =
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> getHibernateConfiguration();
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> configuration.buildMappings();
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> final SchemaUpdate schemaUpdate = new
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> SchemaUpdate(configuration);
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> however it seems that the SchemaUpdate constructor
>>>>>>> has been
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> removed and now
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> a new one is added:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --------
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> public SchemaUpdate(MetadataImplementor
>>>>>>> metadata) {
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> this(
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> metadata.getMetadataBuildingOptions().getServiceRegistry(),
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> metadata );
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> ---------
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Also the configuration.buildMappings() method has
>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> deprecated. Where do
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> I get the MetadataImplementor from? Also is there
>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>> > >> changelog I
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> can refer
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> to?
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, Petar!
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Public PGP Key at:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF 55A5
>>>>>>> 1965 8550
>>>>>>> > C311
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 0611
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Regards, Petar!
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Public PGP Key at:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF 55A5 1965
>>>>>>> 8550 C311
>>>>>>> > >> 0611
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> --
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> Regards, Petar!
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> ---
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> Public PGP Key at:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF 55A5 1965 8550
>>>>>>> C311
>>>>>>> > 0611
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>> --
>>>>>>> > >> >>>> Regards, Petar!
>>>>>>> > >> >>>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>>>>>>> > >> >>>> ---
>>>>>>> > >> >>>> Public PGP Key at:
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
>>>>>>> > >> >>>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF 55A5 1965 8550
>>>>>>> C311 0611
>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>>
>>>>>>> > >> >>
>>>>>>> > >> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> > >> > hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> > >> > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> > >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> > hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards, Petar!
>>>>>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Public PGP Key at:
>>>>>> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
>>>>>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF 55A5 1965 8550 C311 0611
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards, Petar!
>>>>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Public PGP Key at:
>>>>> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
>>>>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF 55A5 1965 8550 C311 0611
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards, Petar!
> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
> ---
> Public PGP Key at:
> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF 55A5 1965 8550 C311 0611
>
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
