Ah. I'd be inclined to not support that.
So -1 from me
On Jan 15, 2013 4:33 PM, "Gail Badner" wrote:
> This is an aggregated composite ID.
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Steve Ebersole"
> > To: "Brett Meyer"
> > Cc: "Gail Badner" , "Hibernate hibernate-dev" <
> hibernate-dev@list
I've added this to the list in HHH-7803.
Thanks,
Gail
- Original Message -
> From: "Gail Badner"
> To: "Steve Ebersole"
> Cc: "Hibernate hibernate-dev"
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:33:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Should Hibernate support @Id for embedded IDs
>
> This is
This is an aggregated composite ID.
- Original Message -
> From: "Steve Ebersole"
> To: "Brett Meyer"
> Cc: "Gail Badner" , "Hibernate hibernate-dev"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:11:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Should Hibernate support @Id for embedded IDs
>
>
>
> A
Are you talking about non-aggregated composite ids? If so, the question is
not just about backwards compatibilty. This is a vendor specific feature
and the question becones whether that feature is still worthwhile.
On Jan 15, 2013 3:56 PM, "Brett Meyer" wrote:
> Up until now, we've always sided
Up until now, we've always sided with backward compatibility, even if it's
against the spec. We do have https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-7803 to
introduce settings that would ease the restrictions. Should this fall under
that?
Brett Meyer
Red Hat Software Engineer, Hibernate
+1 260.349
I've noticed that some failures using the new metamodel are due to embedded IDs
being annotated with @Id instead of @EmbeddedId.
Should Hibernate support this mapping?
Thanks,
Gail
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://li
