This is an aggregated composite ID.
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Ebersole" <st...@hibernate.org> > To: "Brett Meyer" <brme...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Gail Badner" <gbad...@redhat.com>, "Hibernate hibernate-dev" > <hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:11:24 PM > Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Should Hibernate support @Id for embedded IDs > > > > Are you talking about non-aggregated composite ids? If so, the > question is not just about backwards compatibilty. This is a vendor > specific feature and the question becones whether that feature is > still worthwhile. > On Jan 15, 2013 3:56 PM, "Brett Meyer" < brme...@redhat.com > wrote: > > > Up until now, we've always sided with backward compatibility, even if > it's against the spec. We do have > https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-7803 to introduce settings > that would ease the restrictions. Should this fall under that? > > Brett Meyer > Red Hat Software Engineer, Hibernate > +1 260.349.5732 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gail Badner" < gbad...@redhat.com > > To: " hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org hibernate-dev" < > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:29:08 PM > Subject: [hibernate-dev] Should Hibernate support @Id for embedded > IDs > > I've noticed that some failures using the new metamodel are due to > embedded IDs being annotated with @Id instead of @EmbeddedId. > > Should Hibernate support this mapping? > > Thanks, > Gail > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
