On Jul 1, 2010, at 22:48, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
> On 1 juil. 2010, at 18:28, Andersen Max wrote:
>
>>
>>> Give me the spec paragraph that says that field has priority over getter.
>>
>> Where is the spec that says getter has priority over field ? :)
>
> The spec does not, that's the poi
On 1 juil. 2010, at 18:28, Andersen Max wrote:
>
>> Give me the spec paragraph that says that field has priority over getter.
>
> Where is the spec that says getter has priority over field ? :)
The spec does not, that's the point :)
> In a separate discussion with the Dali (eclipse jpa tooli
> Give me the spec paragraph that says that field has priority over getter.
Where is the spec that says getter has priority over field ? :)
In a separate discussion with the Dali (eclipse jpa tooling) team it seems like
for orm.xml it is not at all specified and thus left up to interpretation o
Give me the spec paragraph that says that field has priority over getter.
On 1 juil. 2010, at 11:06, Andersen Max wrote:
>> The spec dedicates a whole paragraph about the default access type using
>> using annotations, but I could
>> not find anything regarding the default access type using o
> The spec dedicates a whole paragraph about the default access type using
> using annotations, but I could
> not find anything regarding the default access type using orm.xml only. It
> seems it is up to
> the implementor to decide on the the default. Why would you consider
> 'property' acce
