On 1 juil. 2010, at 18:28, Andersen Max wrote: > >> Give me the spec paragraph that says that field has priority over getter. > > Where is the spec that says getter has priority over field ? :)
The spec does not, that's the point :) > In a separate discussion with the Dali (eclipse jpa tooling) team it seems > like > for orm.xml it is not at all specified and thus left up to interpretation of > the vendor > and it seems the ref implementation (eclipselink) takes the opposite approach > to > this than Hibernate and we get stuck in the middle. +1 some kind of "dialect". I do believe getter is a better choice for Hibernate and in general for various reasons, but I am also sympathetic to the other side. _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
