Hi Adam,
You may refer to this exchange
https://yhetil.org/guix-patches/87ttd3t4b0.fsf@kitej/
Seems that the preferred approach is to package dependencies, unless you
have a very good reason not to.
C.
manual advices using the "--keep-failed" flag when
you build packages. Using a shell container helps to understand this kind
of cryptic messages too.
--
Cayetano Santos
g special needed?
> - it seems there is a file-naming convention on the keyring branch for the
> keys?
> - do i need to pull the keyring in manually over time of does the machinery
> take care of
> this?
Have you checked with other public channels ?
--
Cayetano Santos
ope it is clear,
[1]:
https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Invoking-guix-time_002dmachine.html
--
Cayetano Santos
GnuPG Key: https://meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp
FingerPrint: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5C DF4D F6BF 6682
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
her yhetil
equivalent around which might help.
Best,
--
Cayetano Santos
.
gpg: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5C DF4D F6BF 6682
key: meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
information related to its owner in the site. It would be great if we
could keep in touch with this person, and find some way to know if
this is a service we may rely on or not.
Thanks,
[1] : https://yhetil.org/guix-user/87ldukzarp@inventati.org/
--
Cayetano Santos
.
gpg: CCB8 1842 F9D7
ce/build-system/bazel.scm
I’ll remove my fork to avoid any further confusion.
--
Cayetano Santos
GnuPG Key: https://meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp
FingerPrint: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5C DF4D F6BF 6682
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
In the test-entry branch, I’m testing the trick in the guix-on-docker
repository, where the entrypoint is given a guix script.
https://gitlab.com/csantosb/gitlabci/-/jobs/8648429390
Getting closer ...
--
Cayetano Santos
GnuPG Key: https://meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp
FingerPrint: CCB8 1842
bci/-/jobs/8648358846
--
Cayetano Santos
GnuPG Key: https://meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp
FingerPrint: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5C DF4D F6BF 6682
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
tence
> which mentioned the package.
>
> But Emacs is different. I put many specifications there.
> That´s why my question.
I’m using a different profile for emacs myself.
Not sure to follow, could you share the manifest ?
--
Cayetano Santos
GnuPG Key: https://meta.sr.ht/~csanto
>sam. 14 déc. 2024 at 19:33, gfp wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Not sure to follow, could you share the manifest ?
>
> This is my emacs manifest:
Ok, so you try to combine two manifests, right ?
See Luis Felipe reply to your original email.
--
Cayetano Santos
GnuPG Key:
cs-swiper0.14.2
> emacs-counsel 0.14.2
> after installing in emacs: bookmark+ and menu-bar+ from Drew Adams
The later is not yet a guix package, right ?
> Any suggestions are welcome
Please, try to follow previous steps, so that we can try to reproduce the error.
--
Cayetano Santos
>jeu. 13 févr. 2025 at 10:43, Laurence Rochfort
>wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 10:40, Cayetano Santos wrote:
>> I’m unable to reproduce in my setup:
>>
>> ...
>> Enter `,help' for help.
>> scheme@(guix-user)> ,m (emacs-guix)
>> sc
I’m unable to reproduce in my setup:
...
Enter `,help' for help.
scheme@(guix-user)> ,m (emacs-guix)
scheme@(emacs-guix)>
Could you try with ‘emacs -q’ ?
--
Cayetano Santos
.
gpg: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5C DF4D F6BF 6682
key: meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
, Privacy Badger, JShelter, PrivacyRedirect,
> UblockOrigin.
I used to have the same problems, until I discovered LibreWolf (up to
date, 135). Never looked back again: give it a try, unless you have a
strong reason to use Icecat.
--
Cayetano Santos
.
gpg: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5
lus
export TERM=xterm
emacs -q -nw
---
Do you observe any anomaly in this case ?
--
Cayetano Santos
.
gpg: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5C DF4D F6BF 6682
key: meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
>mar. 11 mars 2025 at 13:52, Stéfane Fermigier wrote:
> 1) Is there a recommended container image to get started? I've tried
> metacall/guix but it doesn't seem to support the architecture I'm using for
> most of my servers (ARMv7).
>
> 2) I have also tried a base Ubuntu 24.04 image with the `gu
>dim. 16 mars 2025 at 11:22, gfp wrote:
> Is there a change to install Betterbird in Guix?
>
> If so, how can I do that?
>
> Or do I have to wait if somebody adds it to the packages?
Icedove is packaged in guix, here:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm?h=
>Tue 08 Apr 2025 at 00:15, Matteo Valsasina wrote:
Guix is similar to emacs in this respect: using stock one is kind of
limiting. You really benefit of their usage when you customise your
experience to your needs.
> Am i missing some best practices?
Getting familiar with packaging is a skill t
else tried ?
Thanks,
[1] https://guile-emacs.org/
[2] https://emacsconf.org/2024/talks/guile/
--
Cayetano Santos
.
gpg: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5C DF4D F6BF 6682
key: meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
>Wed 09 Apr 2025 at 04:22, Aleksej via wrote:
> Emacs 30.1 is available on "emacs-team" branch, so, the best way is probably
> to wait until
> it's merged. You could also use package inferiors to add it, but I'm not sure
> if that is a
> good idea.
As an alternative, one may set the "branch"
>Tue 08 Apr 2025 at 22:47, Snikta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to run the latest stable version of Emacs, but I'm not sure how to
> achieve this on
> Guix.
Out of curiosity, I just found this guix channel, which looks interesting
if you feel like living in the bleeding edge.
https://github.com
>dim. 20 avril 2025 at 12:22, Cayetano Santos wrote:
>>jeu. 17 avril 2025 at 15:28, Aristide Doussot
>>wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am new to Guix and want to create a guix package for the free machine
>> learning
>> framework CIANNA.
>jeu. 24 avril 2025 at 15:24, Timothee Mathieu
>wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are trying to have a reproducible workflow for usage in reinforcement
> learning. To test
> the reproducibility, we use a guix shell container with fixed commits
In your channel file, you’re not fixing guix-science commit,
>mer. 30 avril 2025 at 16:51, Timothee Mathieu
>wrote:
> Maybe this is not really about the OS, could this be due to how guix was
> installed ? On
> Arch I installed via the script whereas on Ubuntu guix was initially
> installed through
> apt.
Good catch. Not only how, but also when. Let me
>jeu. 01 mai 2025 at 12:30, Andreas Enge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 11:02:08PM +0200 schrieb Noé Lopez:
>> As far as I know its accepted that packages are updated to versions
>> beyond their current release in Guix. Especially if they don’t work
>> without that version. See “inf
>mer. 23 avril 2025 at 11:56, Gary Johnson wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> The offlineimap3 package is broken in the current version of Guix due
> to a longstanding bug in offlineimap3 that makes it incompatible with
> Python 3.11 (which is now the default python version in Guix).
A patch upgrading to la
>sam. 19 avril 2025 at 02:24, Fredrik Salomonsson wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> Sorry for the spam. But not just Emacs that broke for me this time.
> To my delight I saw that gimp got upgraded to 3.0 recently. Or more I
> discovered it when starting gimp and 3.0 splash screen popped up. The
> joy did
ith
"org-roam-db-insert-link". At this point, M-x org-roam-db-sync performs
as expected.
There is a second one, where I’m unable to save org-mode buffers.
(wrong-type-argument integer-or-marker-p nil)
M-x org-mode fixes it.
Annoying, anyway.
--
Cayetano Santos
[0] https://github.co
t; Seems like it might be an issue with Emacs-29. I just switched to
>> emacs-next-pgtk and the issue is gone.
>
> I spoke too soon. While I don't get the issue starting Emacs anymore or
> viewing my agenda. I do get it instead when adding entries with
> org-roam-capture.
Try to:
(load-file
"/gnu/store/6hwp233fcdyl00g7j8vj4f0fnak6wx5a-emacs-org-roam-2.2.2-2.046822b/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-roam-2.2.2-2.046822b/org-roam-db.el")
at the very end of your config.
--
Cayetano Santos
.
gpg: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5C DF4D F6BF 6682
key: meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
>lun. 12 mai 2025 at 20:54, Carlo Zancanaro wrote:
> I ran into this issue recently, too.
>
> On Sat, Apr 19 2025, Fredrik Salomonsson wrote:
>> That worked for me as well. Which kind of looks like the native
>> compile file is out of date or something.
>
> I suspect this is true, but it's rela
>jeu. 29 mai 2025 at 22:21, Heime via wrote:
> Have been using Trisquel 11, which is released with GCC-12 and Emacs-27.1 -
> both lagging well behind the current GCC-15.1 and Emacs-30.1.
>
> Handling all the required dependencies when building GCC-15.1 and Emacs-30.1
> from source is becoming he
>sam. 31 mai 2025 at 21:08, Heime via wrote:
> Have just started using guix as a package manager on trisquel.
>
> Have also downloaded the iso so I can install a complete guix
> system on a separate machine.
>
> The guix website mentions using one language for everything using
> Guile Scheme. A
>jeu. 12 juin 2025 at 15:19, Alexis Simon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to reinstall my guix setup on ubuntu 25.04 to benefit from the
> unpriviledged
> guix-daemon.
Did you completely removed previous install before ?
> I used the latest binary package with the install.sh script to perform a
>
>jeu. 10 juil. 2025 at 04:23, Fredrik Salomonsson wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> Anyone that has encountered something similar? Or know a good way of
> debugging this?
In general, the easier approach to debug an emacs related issue would be
to provide a simple recipe replicating the problem.
For exampl
>jeu. 10 juil. 2025 at 18:04, Gabor Gero wrote:
> Sorry, I should have mentioned that guix upgrade reports that there is
> nothing to upgrade,
> guix search still shows old versions of packages (Emacs 28.2 for example),
> and additional
> channels in my channels.scm don't get pulled.
I’m usin
>jeu. 10 juil. 2025 at 17:24, Gabor Gero via wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I'm running Guix on top of Debian, from Debian's repos. Running guix pull
> both with and
> without sudo -i, will not actually update the repository, every package stays
> the same
> version. Restarting the guix-daemon system
>dim. 13 juil. 2025 at 02:09, lev...@riseup.net wrote:
> I've been using guixSD on this computer for nearly a year now, but in
> attempting to do nearly anything with guix i feel very stupid and
> hopelessly frustrated because there is ALMOST information about things
> but not really.
>
> where i
>sam. 05 juil. 2025 at 17:06, Gary Johnson wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I just ran into an extremely odd error today when I tried to include the
> iproute2
> package in a Guix container created with the --emulate-fhs (-F) option.
>
> =
>
>
>mer. 16 juil. 2025 at 08:03, Gabor Gero via wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I have Guix installed on top of Debian, and whenever I try to guix pull with
> any channel
> specified in ~/.config/guix/channels.scm, I get the error message "guix pull:
> error: Git
> error: failed to connect to codeberg.or
>ven. 25 juil. 2025 at 22:30, Heime wrote:
> I want to use piper-tts, a text-to-speech program. Although I
> have tried espeak and festival, their voices sound too mechanical.
>
> piper-tts provides more natural-sounding voices. However, I have
> found installing piper-tts to be challenging.
>mer. 30 juil. 2025 at 22:18, Polyedre wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to use the rust programming language on my Guix System
> laptop. The project work on requires the version of cargo to be at least
> 1.85.0 because it uses the "2024 edition" of rust.
The new Rust toolchain 1.88 is on its w
-/blob/test-entry/.gitlab-ci.yml
Do you have an example file on how to use the image ?
Thanks !
--
Cayetano Santos
GnuPG Key: https://meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp
FingerPrint: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5C DF4D F6BF 6682
43 matches
Mail list logo
