Hi!
Vincent Legoll skribis:
> I'm wondering if there's interest in reducing the bare-bones system
> footprint, there are some X / GUI stuff in there that may / could /
> should be trimmed IMHO...
>
> And what would be the way to do this ?
Sorry for the late reply. This would be interesting, an
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 6:28 PM, David Craven wrote:
> Could it be that these are dependencies of wacom which is a dependency
> of libinput? In that case you can try replacing libinput with
> libinput-minimal.
Thanks for the hint, I got the following during libinput -> libinput-minimal
transition
> As if I was designing an embedded system with no place in the flash
> for anything superfluous, maybe that was a bad assumption...
I soc that doesn't support an sd card won't support linux either ;-)
Generally flash is used for the bootloader and then linux or guixsd is
loaded from an sd card..
> I know these probably come from indirect dependencies of other tools,
> for advanced features... (please remember that I come with a long
> background of gentoo negated use flags)
>
> libXpm, cairo, libxcb, randrproto, glibmm, randrproto, mkfontscale,
> inputproto, imagemagick, xtrans, gtk+, comp
>> I'm wondering if there's interest in reducing the bare-bones system
>> footprint, there are some X / GUI stuff in there that may / could /
>> should be trimmed IMHO...
>
> Like what?
I know these probably come from indirect dependencies of other tools,
for advanced features... (please remember
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:48:16AM +0200, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering if there's interest in reducing the bare-bones system
> footprint, there are some X / GUI stuff in there that may / could /
> should be trimmed IMHO...
Like what?
> And what would be the way to do this ?
Hello,
I'm wondering if there's interest in reducing the bare-bones system
footprint, there are some X / GUI stuff in there that may / could /
should be trimmed IMHO...
And what would be the way to do this ?
--
Vincent Legoll
