>> I'm wondering if there's interest in reducing the bare-bones system >> footprint, there are some X / GUI stuff in there that may / could / >> should be trimmed IMHO... > > Like what?
I know these probably come from indirect dependencies of other tools, for advanced features... (please remember that I come with a long background of gentoo negated use flags) libXpm, cairo, libxcb, randrproto, glibmm, randrproto, mkfontscale, inputproto, imagemagick, xtrans, gtk+, compositeproto, cups*, inkscape, xextproto, freetype, libXrender, gdk-pixbuf, libxcb, libXdmcp, libXaw, xcb-proto, pixman, netpbm, libvorbis, libcddb, openjpeg, atkmm, libxmu, libx11, etc... And I may have missed some... Some come probably as "guix graph" deps... I was thinking of bare-bone just as what that name implies, just what is needed for booting, guix dependencies, and nothing more... As if I was designing an embedded system with no place in the flash for anything superfluous, maybe that was a bad assumption... >> And what would be the way to do this ? > > I would take a look at gnu/system.scm which, if I understand correctly, > implements the core of GuixSD. > > Variables like %base-packages and %base-firmware might be interesting to > look at. I'll first try to remove some from the %base-packages list and see what is trimmable... > By the way, people usually ask about *adding* things to the bare-bones > example :) Maybe make a real bare-bones, and then based upon this one, a more "usable" CLI-system, with more stuff added. -- Vincent Legoll