Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-30 Thread Jean Louis
* Richard Stallman [2019-10-30 03:04]: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > > I am calling those who have int

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread Jean Louis
her than any deep-seated conviction,[4] and engaging in disingenuous arguments.[5] OK fine, now I get it, that is exactly what GNU project is not for! GNU project is for everybody, it is not a platform to be abused by feminists or any kind of political activists! > p.s2: A social network text message proof of nothing. Exactly! Jean Louis P.S. Please don't make abort() jokes or you are not welcome in Guix.

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread Jean Louis
Dear P, See my comments below. * P [2019-10-10 22:33]: > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Thursday, October 10, 2019 7:22 PM, Jean Louis wrote: > > > > Your problem is that you published this statement to guix-devel. If you > > > don't mind, I'll fo

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread Jean Louis
eally proponent, he is programmer, but that is not same. He is rather opportunist pushing himself and his own goals forward. One cannot expect more but what he does now. Jean Louis

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread Jean Louis
project pages, those pro-feminist group of GNU maintainers have tried to make GNU project political. Jean Louis Footnotes: [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtcrime

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

2019-10-12 Thread Jean Louis
welcoming feminists, and contra-feminists, but for as long as the GNU project is not abused to spread out their propaganda. And nobody is preventing them to publish their opinions outside of GNU project. If they have balls for that. Jean Louis

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread Jean Louis
Dear Ludovic, Hello, how are you? I was on long travel, could not answer you earlier. * Ludovic Courtès [2019-10-10 16:29]: > Hi Jean-Louis, > > Jean Louis skribis: > > > * Ricardo Wurmus [2019-10-10 07:09]: > >> I have previously asked you privately to stop spam

Re: ‘censorship’

2019-10-12 Thread Jean Louis
* Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-10-12 11:36]: > David wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 21:11:51 +0300 Dmitry > > Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> You replied privately, offlist. Was it intentional? If yes, why: I see > >> nothing secret there? > > > > Absolutely yes, and

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

2019-10-12 Thread Jean Louis
* Kete via Discussions about the development of the GNU system [2019-10-12 03:28]: > On 10/11/2019 04:43 PM, Alexander Vdolainen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 10/11/19 11:16 PM, Kete via Discussions about the development of the > > GNU system wrote: > >> On 1

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread Jean Louis
* Svante Signell [2019-10-10 22:23]: > On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 19:22 +0000, Jean Louis wrote: > > > > > > > Your problem is that you published this statement to guix-devel. If > > > you don't mind, I'll forward your mail to gnu-system-discuss,

Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ---> RMS : ?? if you are going to use acronyms unknown to many in the audience, footnote them ! + FUD

2019-10-11 Thread Jean Louis
* Mancini [2019-10-11 17:31]: > ---> "RMS" : ?? if you are going to use acronyms unknown to > many in the audience, footnote them ! + "FUD" You are right, yes, all text shall be clear. For FUD: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty,_and_doubt Fear, uncertainty, and doubt (

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
On October 10, 2019 8:29:06 PM UTC, Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote: >Jean Louis wrote: >> How are you? > >Ehm... Fine. What is the occasion to ask? We are then from different cultures simply. At my side it is always used similarly as hand shaking. >

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
-own-domain-GNU-org.html On October 10, 2019 8:23:11 PM UTC, Svante Signell wrote: >On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 19:22 +0000, Jean Louis wrote: >> >> >> > Your problem is that you published this statement to guix-devel. If >> > you don't mind, I'll forward you

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
d I hope they have enough respect for GNU >and RMS heritage not to follow you strong advice. They have no respect for RMS. Jean Louis

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
It is not harmful if Guix remains free software, how it can be? It is only harmful for Guix. It was not my decision, it is theirs. On October 10, 2019 11:39:42 AM UTC, Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote: >Jean Louis wrote: >> * Alexander Vdolainen [2019-10-09 23:13]

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
have told my concerns to them privately and on chat before sending it to mailing list. Would they provide facts, I would refrain. Obviously the thought police is afraid and must silence defenders of RMS and his works. So why is it problem to address the same on the Guix making list? Is it mayb

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
in public. Just have balls, as RMS has got the balls, endure it and be happy. Wish you good night, Jean Louis On October 10, 2019 2:29:08 PM UTC, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote: >Hi Jean-Louis, > >Jean Louis skribis: > >> * Ricardo Wurmus [2019-10-10 07:09]: >>>

Re: Matt, here is kind question to provide facts on your statements about RMS

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
* Wilson Bustos [2019-10-09 17:41]: > Jean Luis, > Seems they don't want to reply, probably because they don't have argument. > Also, the project signs without as anyone to do it, they just did it. > There is not a vote to say 'The project is agree with this issue'. > > At least everyone now they

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
* František Kučera [2019-10-07 17:14]: > > Hello Guix! > > > > We, a group of GNU maintainers sharing a vision for a stronger GNU > > Project, are publishing this statement today: > > > >https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project/ > > > > We are somewhat abusing the G

Re: Matt, here is kind question to provide facts on your statements about RMS

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
* Wilson Bustos [2019-10-09 23:42]: > Jean Luis, > Seems they don't want to reply, probably because they don't have > argument. Also, the project signs without as anyone to do it, they > just did it. There is not a vote to say 'The project is agree with > this issue'. > > At least everyone now

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
* Ricardo Wurmus [2019-10-10 07:09]: > I have previously asked you privately to stop spamming our mailing > lists. I am asking you a second time publicly. If you keep disrupting > our mailing lists your posts will be moderated. I cannot expect anything else from you. Jean

Re: Matt, here is kind question to provide facts on your statements about RMS - that statement caused this discussion

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
* František Kučera [2019-10-09 16:39]: > Dne 09. 10. 19 v 19:06 P napsal(a): > > Stop spamming the list. Thanks. > > > If you did not want to start this discussion, you should not have posted > that statement on the official Guix blog. You could expect what it would do. > > Franta Exactly, that

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
* Dimakakos Dimos [2019-10-08 12:38]: > On the subject, I think that the discussion of rms's position in GNU is > valid but that at the same time such an announcment should be made after > a careful consideration and research. There was no public discussion. I am not against their opinion, and an

Re: Matt, here is kind question to provide facts on your statements about RMS

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
* František Kučera [2019-10-09 18:11]: > Dne 09. 10. 19 v 23:41 Wilson Bustos napsal(a): > > Seems they don't want to reply, probably because they don't have argument. > > Also, the project signs without as anyone to do it, they just did it. > > There is not a vote to say 'The project is agree wit

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
* Andy Wingo [2019-10-09 11:49]: > For what it is worth, I have some personal answers to some of these > questions here: > > https://wingolog.org/archives/2019/10/08/thoughts-on-rms-and-gnu I am appreciating that you are publishing your opinions beyond the GUIX.GNU.ORG and GNU.ORG domains. Tha

Re: Ricardo, here is kind question to provide facts on your statements about RMS

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
* Wilson Bustos [2019-10-09 23:54]: > I think even more important, > When I read that statement I thought every Guix collaborator is in > favor of that statement, or at least a major number of them. And that is exactly what is not being spread on Internet. I would like to ask those "GNU maintai

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
* Ludovic Courtès [2019-10-07 17:41]: > Hi František, and welcome, > > (I’m willing to answer questions like I wrote, but if we are to have a > more in-depth conversation, I think we should not abuse guix-devel for > that.) Now is too late, you are the one who abused Guix, and you should step do

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

2019-10-10 Thread Jean Louis
* Alexander Vdolainen [2019-10-09 23:13]: > I'm nobody (yep, I'm using GNU Guile, GNU Emacs and GUIX and a lot > of other GNU projects (make, gcc, binutils etc ...), but I'm not a > great contributor yet). However those events are going to look like > a decision point to move on from GNU communit

Re: guix installed Emacs

2016-04-16 Thread Jean Louis
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 02:52:10PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > Another thing: I noticed that Guix's Emacs doesn't display some buttons > on the tool bar. This should probably (I'm not sure) be fixed by > installing some icon theme in your profile, for example > 'adwaita-icon-theme'. > > -- > Alex

Re: guix installed Emacs

2016-04-15 Thread Jean Louis
ngs that you previously had with the other distribution. Try to match the fonts, and install more fonts from Guix packages. Jean Louis

Re: bug#22970: guix edit mutt -- not working

2016-03-13 Thread Jean Louis
+0300, Alex Kost wrote: > Jean Louis (2016-03-10 22:34 +0300) wrote: > > > Hello Andreas, > > > > I have now 2 files in gnu/guix/packages/*.scm, for mutt and postgresql: > > and now I get each time on running guix, following: > > > > guix package: warning: f

Re: bug#22970: guix edit mutt -- not working

2016-03-12 Thread Jean Louis
ckage-arguments mutt) ((#:configure-flags cf) `(cons "--enable-hcache" ,cf (synopsis (string-append (package-synopsis mutt) " (configured with --enable-hcache)" On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:13:06AM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: >

Re: bug#22970: guix edit mutt -- not working

2016-03-11 Thread Jean Louis
te-keyword-arguments (package-arguments mutt) ((#:configure-flags cf) `(cons "--enable-hcache" ,cf (synopsis (string-append (package-synopsis mutt) " (configured with --enable-hcache)" On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:21:09PM +0

Re: bug#22970: guix edit mutt -- not working

2016-03-11 Thread Jean Louis
Hello Alex, Thank you much. That looks like a solution that is valuable, and I would like to see that in future documentation. The info documentation and guix package --help now provide the option to read the file and evaluate from file, and I guess that this solution you provided is better for f

Re: bug#22970: guix edit mutt -- not working

2016-03-10 Thread Jean Louis
cm file. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:44:33AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:22:20AM +0100, Jean Louis wrote: > > And I could not save the file in my home directory, and do: > > guix package -i mutt -f mail.scm > > As mentioned on IRC, modify the file mai

Re: Guix unmounted my /home, while -i hello

2016-03-10 Thread Jean Louis
Hello Ludo, It will certainly happen again. I have solved it for myself, but it may happen to somebody in future by same manner. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:29:31PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > g...@rcdrun.com skribis: > > > My personal problem is solved. > > Great! > > > But there is proble

Re: How to solve /etc/login.defs

2016-03-10 Thread Jean Louis
LANGUAGE="en_US.UTF-8" export LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8" exec icewm-session On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:09:08PM +0800, 宋文武 wrote: > Jean Louis writes: > > > Hello, > > > > I am using guix on Debian. The default path for guix is: > > $HOME/.guix-pro

Re: guix package -i emacs, failed

2016-03-10 Thread Jean Louis
Hello, Is there way to download binary directly? On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:05:05PM +0800, 宋文武 wrote: > Jean Louis writes: > > > Hello, > > > > Yesterday I was trying to compile emacs from guix: guix package -i > > emacs, and it did not work, it said: gdk-pixbuf

How to solve /etc/login.defs

2016-03-09 Thread Jean Louis
to know that default $PATH is ~/.guix-profile/bin? among others? Jean Louis

guix package -i emacs, failed

2016-03-09 Thread Jean Louis
emacs. It is basic to have emacs first. Jean Louis

Cannot finish programs in terminal

2016-03-09 Thread Jean Louis
Hello, I am on Debian and have following packages installed. I am using zsh, and there was no problem yesterday, today is like this, I run some program, and I cannot CONTROL-C neither CONTROL-Z and terminal waits for something very very long time. This happens only 1-2 times with 1-2 commands in t

Re: guix edit mutt -- with new option, and dependency, how I got it working

2016-03-09 Thread Jean Louis
, one need to wait long time, for mutt to read all the headers, seconds. This way it is 1 second. It should be included by default, as GuixSD does have external database libraries. Jean Louis Mutt documentation: .1. Header Caching Mutt provides optional support for caching message headers

guix edit mutt -- with new option, and dependency, how I got it working

2016-03-09 Thread Jean Louis
Hello, I wish to share how I got this working: I wanted to do command: guix edit mutt only that one could not edit the file, so I have saved the file locally. Andreas Enge pointed that I have to do following: From: Andreas Enge To: Jean Louis Cc: 22970-d...@debbugs.gnu.org, help-guix@gnu.org