Hi,
I've removed the cuirass service from my operating system configuration.
After rebooting and many generations later, I still see cuirass in the
root's services. I have to manually do `sudo herd stop cuirass` at
every boot..
Any idea?
--
Olivier Dion
oldiob.dev
jgart writes:
> Why is the scheme record needed?
It is a Scheme representation of a derivation, which also has an on-disk
representation.
> How does it function in Guix?
Everything that the daemon is asked to build must be compiled to a
derivation on disk first. From the perspective of the
On Sat, 17 Sep 2022 20:01:33 +0200 Edouard Klein wrote:
> My bet would be on "Guix" ?
Yes, maybe...
My bet would be on "Guix" ?
jgart writes:
> Hi,
>
> What does the "G" in G-expressions stand for?
>
> all best,
>
> jgart
On Sat, 17 Sep 2022 17:43:17 +0200 Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> ;;;
> ;;; 2. Gexps embed information about the derivations they refer to.
Why do gexps embed information about the derivations they refer to?
> > How does a gexp relate to a derivation?
>
>
> The module comment of (guix gexp) says this:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>
> ;;; This module implements "G-expressions", or "gexps". Gexps are like
> ;;; S-expressions (sexps), with two differences:
>
"Daniel Sockwell" writes:
> But isn't that something that Guix is really *good* at handling?
> My understanding is that one of Guix's selling points is that it
> allows package A to depend on both B and C even if B and C depend
> on different versions of D (aka, the diamond-dependency problem).
Hi,
Why is the scheme record needed?
How does it function in Guix?
all best,
jgart
> How does a gexp relate to a derivation?
The module comment of (guix gexp) says this:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
;;; This module implements "G-expressions", or "gexps". Gexps are like
;;; S-expressions (sexps), with two differences:
;;;
;;; 1. Referenc
Hi,
What does the "G" in G-expressions stand for?
all best,
jgart
Hi,
How does a gexp relate to a derivation?
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Gottfried writes:
>> "Die folgenden Pakete würden aktualisiert:"
>>
>> It should be:
>>
>> "Die folgenden Pakete würden aktualisiert werden:"
>>
>> It's missing one word at the end: "werden".
>
> Both of these sentences are correct here, though the second one is more
> co
12 matches
Mail list logo