Jesse Becker writes:
> The community also used to have cfwiki.org as a place to post snippets,
> and it was quite active for some time. However, it fell victem to
> spambots and has been taken offline. In an attempt to replace it, I've
> created cfengineers.org (also a wiki), and I'm quite happ
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: CFEngine Help: Re: CFEngine Help: Thoughts about some cfengine
design decisions?
Author: sauer
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24311,24379#msg-24379
Ted Zlatanov Wrote:
> I think local classes should remain as they are, but the user should
>
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: (addendum) How easy/simple is cfengine?
Author: zzamboni
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24353,24380#msg-24380
Just a teaser, we are working on a project to provide a repository for
community sharing of modules, bundles and policies. More det
On 12/20/2011 11:48 AM, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
> Forum: CFEngine Help
> Subject: Re: (addendum) How easy/simple is cfengine?
> Author: zzamboni
> Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24353,24380#msg-24380
>
> Just a teaser, we are working on a project to provide a repository
On 12/20/2011 06:28 PM, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
> Forum: CFEngine Help
> Subject: Re: CFEngine Help: Re: CFEngine Help: Thoughts about some cfengine
> design decisions?
> Author: sauer
> Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24311,24379#msg-24379
>
> Ted Zlatanov Wrote:
>> I th
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:42:03 -0600 Nick Anderson wrote:
NA> What would the best way to capture a list of the files detected changed
NA> into a list?
Use etckeeper+Git, it will do a much better job, especially if you
snapshot often. Then you just use Git commands from CFEngine or outside
(which
I think the argument about "." being dual-purposed as a scoping operator
as well as a boolean operator is valid. I don't think anybody is
arguing (at least strongly) that "." is an invalid operator for "and",
but rather that when reading through the policy, seeing "." makes many
programmers th
Good point, Paul.
--
Sent from my Android phone with probably ridiculous and involuntary spelling
corrections
Paul Krizak wrote:
I think the argument about "." being dual-purposed as a scoping operator
as well as a boolean operator is valid. I don't think anybody is
arguing (at least strong
