Forum: CFEngine Help Subject: Re: CFEngine Help: Re: CFEngine Help: Thoughts about some cfengine design decisions? Author: sauer Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24311,24379#msg-24379
Ted Zlatanov Wrote: > I think local classes should remain as they are, but the user should > have an option to push them to the global scope. Otherwise cfengine has > to change the class selector syntax to denote scope; obviously > "bundle.classname" won't work because "." is AND > already, so the syntax will get nasty. I never use the . as an "and" operator, because it's the one thing in CFEngine which isn't consistent; sometimes it's used to specify scope, and other times it's used as a boolean. I'd personally *really* like to see the ability to turn on a compatability option in the agent control body which switches the period in class names from a boolean operator over to a scope specifier. _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@cfengine.org https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
