Is the normal ordering as documented in the ref guide correct?
vars
classes
outputs
interfaces
processes
storage
packages
commands
methods
files
In a bundle that has vars, classes, files and packages promises, I see
the ordering start out like this:
cf3
cf3==
Well, that was me asking for files before methods. I can't remember
the way we've been discussing the normal ordering at whole, but now
the ordering is as follows (from src/agent.c):
char *TYPESEQUENCE[] =
{
"vars",
"classes",/* Maelstrom order 2 */
"outputs",
"interfaces",
"
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Looking for ideas on people's config
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19114,19117#msg-19117
##
bundle common gclass {
classes:
"b1" or => { "unxxhd01", "sterlz
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Best platform to run cf-engine server
(community)
Author: hristob
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19107,19118#msg-19118
Thanks for the info...
I was following the bugtracker with the issue and waited for 3.1.0 to be
relea
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: normal ordering
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19115,19119#msg-19119
The current reference shows a different order.
http://www.cfengine.org/manuals/cf3-reference.html#Agent-normal-ordering
Hi,
As the number of different types of hosts in my configuration
grows, I wonder what are the strategies for making bundlesequence
and inputs more modular.
I define a class for each type of hosts so, of course, there's
the class approach:
body common control
{
class1::
bundlese
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: normal ordering
Author: Seva Gluschenko
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19115,19121#msg-19121
Well, perhaps, the reference is obsolete and should be updated to reflect the
real world situation.
By the way, the current ordering still isn't op
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: normal ordering
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19115,19122#msg-19122
I suspect that if we sat down for drinks we'd all find a reason to change the
ordering :) It's a compromise to fit most but not all cases.
___
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:10:46AM -0500, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
>Forum: Cfengine Help
>Subject: Re: normal ordering
>Author: neilhwatson
>Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19115,19122#msg-19122
>
>I suspect that if we sat down for drinks we'd all find a reason to change th
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: normal ordering
Author: Seva Gluschenko
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19115,19123#msg-19123
I see no need for compromise in question of methods vs processes ordering ).
___
Help-cfengine mailing l
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: number of cf-monitor processes
Author: Authority
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19125,19125#msg-19125
I've written a promise to make sure cf-monitord (only) has one process running
but it keeps getting tripped by finding two cf-monitord processe
Daniel V. Klein écrit :
> IMHO, the better strategy is to put everything (common and specific) in the
> inputs
I'd rather have only what's needed for each type of host instead
of loading everything.
> and then select what is executed in the bundle sequence. But better still is
> to have all t
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: number of cf-monitor processes
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19125,19126#msg-19126
Likely the process name matching regular expression is matching something else.
Please show us your promise.
__
On Nov 8, 2010, at 8:02 AM, Marc Baudoin wrote:
> Daniel V. Klein écrit :
>> IMHO, the better strategy is to put everything (common and specific) in the
>> inputs
>
> I'd rather have only what's needed for each type of host instead
> of loading everything.
I know - but I told you what I thoug
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: number of cf-monitor processes
Author: Authority
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19125,19128#msg-19128
I find that doubtful.
"cf-monitord"
comment => "Cfengine 3 environment monitor" ,
process_count
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: number of cf-monitor processes
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19125,19129#msg-19129
Please show the ps_owner body.
___
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
http
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: number of cf-monitor processes
Author: Authority
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19125,19131#msg-19131
body process_select ps_owner(owner)
{
process_owner => { "$(owner)" };
process_result => "process_owner";
}
___
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: number of cf-monitor processes
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19125,19132#msg-19132
$ cf-agent -IKf ./montest.cf
!! Process count for 'cf-monitord' was out of promised range (0 found)
I: Report relates to a promise with
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: number of cf-monitor processes
Author: Authority
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19125,19133#msg-19133
Your description of the functionality of the promise is the same as mine, so I
guess it's good we're reading it the same.
Took us a while,
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: number of cf-monitor processes
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19125,19134#msg-19134
Showstate as you have listed will show you everything. It has now knowledge of
your promises. You will be able to look at the list for
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: bundlesequence and inputs using readstringlist
Author: skibumatbu
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19057,19135#msg-19135
Seva, can you clarify what you mean by that? Perhaps it would be easier if you
can show me a working example where bundles
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: preserve_block always sets repaired flag?
Author: babudro
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19098,19136#msg-19136
Filed in the bug tracker: Bug #361
___
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengi
Hi-
I recently implemented a "service cfengine3 restart" weekly cron job as a
workaround to the MAX_FD bug that others and myself have seen. I neglected
to except the master from the restart so when cf-serverd was killed a number
of hosts complained about in-flight transfers or not being able to
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: "was not able to copy file" - critical corruption during cf-agent
run
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19137,19138#msg-19138
To avoid the the clients connecting to the server while the server is
restarting stagger the sche
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Marc Baudoin
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the number of different types of hosts in my configuration
> grows, I wonder what are the strategies for making bundlesequence
> and inputs more modular.
>
> I define a class for each type of hosts so, of course, there's
> the class
Hello,
I am not sure my question arrives at the appropriate location but here it is
:
I have to prove that cfengine uses blowfish. I think that wireshark could do
that . I have seen a blowfish choice in "preferences" but I dont know really
how to do that. Can you help.
Regards
Franc
___
BTW, I had not seen this MAX_FD complaint before upgrading to Nova 2.0b
... :sigh:
On 11/7/10 3:37 PM, Frans Lawaetz wrote:
> As far as I know this is a bug with cf-execd where it does not release
> file descriptors and eventually runs out of them. I have a weekly cron
> job to restart cfengin
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: keys
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19140,19142#msg-19142
You could look in the source code.
n...@ettin ~/src/cfengine-3.0.5/src $ grep -i blow *
cf.defs.h:#define CF_BLOWFISHSIZE 16
enterprise_stubs.c:return CF_BLOWFISHSI
I just found that 3.1.0 handles differently the combination of
insert_lines and replace_patterns. Before 3.1.0, once insert_lines had
inserted a line, it would not be re-inserted after replace_patterns
has changed it.
In 3.1.0 however, it seems that insert_lines will be evaluated up to 3
times, ev
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: bundlesequence and inputs using readstringlist
Author: Seva Gluschenko
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19057,19144#msg-19144
Scott,
I've looked further into your issue. Your initial readstringlist call is wrong,
pcre_exec hangs with your com
Frans,
since you're terminating cf-serverd in the middle of a file transfer,
the receiving agent reasonably treats it as a corruption. There's
nothing wrong with it. On the other hand, why terminating cf-serverd
when you just need to restart cf-execd? Modify your promise and feel
safe.
2010/11/8
On 9 nov 2010, at 08:37, Seva Gluschenko wrote:
> Frans,
>
> since you're terminating cf-serverd in the middle of a file transfer,
> the receiving agent reasonably treats it as a corruption. There's
> nothing wrong with it. On the other hand, why terminating cf-serverd
> when you just need to re
32 matches
Mail list logo
