Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: bundles with the same name
Author: sauer
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,25854,25927#msg-25927
I thought I got some kind of error when I was using something like an agent and
executor bundle, both with the same name (I wanted to use the
On 05/11/2012 09:39 AM, Gregory Matthews wrote:
> except when you need a caffeine boost and you say "Mike, get me a coffee"
>
> I don't care which Mike brings my coffee ;)
Something like
commands:
mike::
"/usr/bin/wget coffee"
action => "immediate";
On 11/05/12 15:14, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> Is it ever confusing to have two people with the same name? Or two
> anything with the
> same name? :) Same thing with bundles...
except when you need a caffeine boost and you say "Mike, get me a coffee"
I don't care which Mike brings my coffee
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Gregory Matthews
wrote:
> Is it bad practice to have bundles with the same name?
Most definitely. I have had students that have tried it and been
confused by the results.
Is it ever confusing to have two people with the same name? Or two
anything with the
same n
On 09/05/12 15:26, Nick Anderson wrote:
> I think you could end up getting some unexpected results if you do that.
>
> If you are referencing a fully qualified variable which one will you get?
>
> My tests show it will vary based on what was defined first. Things could
> get really confusing. It al
On 05/09/2012 08:19 AM, Gregory Matthews wrote:
> Is it bad practice to have bundles with the same name? e.g.
>
> bundle common g {
> ...
> }
>
> bundle agent g {
> ...
> }
>
> it provides some convenience for us and appears to work but am I storing
> up trouble for myself?
I think you could end u
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: bundles with the same name
Author: zzamboni
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,25854,25855#msg-25855
Hi Greg,
I don't think this is a good practice, because bundles of type common can also
be included in the bundlesequence. In my testin
