On 09/05/12 15:26, Nick Anderson wrote: > I think you could end up getting some unexpected results if you do that. > > If you are referencing a fully qualified variable which one will you get? > > My tests show it will vary based on what was defined first. Things could > get really confusing. It also appears to be affected by the use of > methods. Here is a gist that contains the same policy reordered a few > times and getting different output. > > https://gist.github.com/2644870
hmmm... ok, I'll rethink it. thanks guys. G > > In fact, I would almost think that the parser should throw an error. > _______________________________________________ > Help-cfengine mailing list > Help-cfengine@cfengine.org > https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine > -- Greg Matthews 01235 778658 Scientific Computing Group Leader Diamond Light Source Ltd. OXON UK -- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail. Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message. Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@cfengine.org https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
