On 04/18/2012 02:13 PM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> Not that I've seen. Great idea. Could you please ask for it?
https://cfengine.com/bugtracker/view.php?id=1079
--
Nick Anderson
___
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
https://cfe
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Nick Anderson wrote:
>
> Oh, it would be cool to have access to $(this.comment) so that a
> cfengine comment could be used inside the promise itself. Is there a
> feature request for that yet?
Not that I've seen. Great idea. Could you please ask for it?
> Alek
On 04/17/2012 09:39 PM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> It might be useful to put that comment into the line itself so you can also
> see it from the command line when logged into the server.
>
> I do something similar with my iptables config file, insert the comments
> as iptables comments (using th
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Nick Anderson wrote:
>
> I prefer to express each line as an individual promise so that I can
> have a comment in the policy about why that access rule was inserted,
> but I am having trouble thinking of a way to do that and preserve order.
It might be useful to pu
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: CFEngine Help: Re: Config file where order matters
Author: sauer
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,25449,25474#msg-25474
It's drifting off topic, but... I don't use the .d include with sudoers for a
couple of reasons. I'm worki
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 20:45:08 +0200 (CEST) sauer wrote:
n> I've been working on this for sudoers, where later entries override
n> earlier entries. The way I'm currently doing it is to have a
n> directory full of small templates which start with a number. It looks
n> like the new lsdir function w
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Config file where order matters
Author: sauer
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,25449,25455#msg-25455
I've been working on this for sudoers, where later entries override earlier
entries. The way I'm currently doing it is to have a
