On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Jesse Becker wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:01:53AM -0400, Seva Gluschenko wrote:
>>
>> Aleksey,
>>
>> don't mess CPU utilization with load average, these two are pretty
>> different. While I doubt seriously that LA could rise to 100 while CPU
>> usage is 6% o
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:01:53AM -0400, Seva Gluschenko wrote:
>Aleksey,
>
>don't mess CPU utilization with load average, these two are pretty
>different. While I doubt seriously that LA could rise to 100 while CPU
>usage is 6% only, they aren't directly connected.
Oh, I've seen boxes with a loa
Aleksey,
don't mess CPU utilization with load average, these two are pretty
different. While I doubt seriously that LA could rise to 100 while CPU
usage is 6% only, they aren't directly connected.
2011/5/15 Aleksey Tsalolikhin :
> Hi. I am trying to think of an example of a policy that reacts to
Hi. I am trying to think of an example of a policy that reacts to
environmental data collected by cf-monitord...
I thought I might do something with "diskfree" but there is already
"freespace" under "volume" that will warn if free space is too low.
Then I thought, how about I check CPU utilizati
