On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Jesse Becker <becker...@mail.nih.gov> wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:01:53AM -0400, Seva Gluschenko wrote: >> >> Aleksey, >> >> don't mess CPU utilization with load average, these two are pretty >> different. While I doubt seriously that LA could rise to 100 while CPU >> usage is 6% only, they aren't directly connected.
Acknowledged. I can't get a correct measurement of either load average (as in, number of jobs waiting for the CPU) or CPU percent utilization, out of Cfengine. > Generally, cycle scavenging programs like SETI@Home, or anything that > runs under the BOINC framework, already have pretty good > self-throttling features that are more flexible than what you could do > with just cfengine. Oh. Got it. > I'd suggest just making a CF3 promise to make sure that your daemons are > running and have the proper configurations. Then let the built-in > routines (in your programs) do their job. I have that already, thank you, and that doesn't require cf-monitord. I'm trying to demonstrate how cf-monitord could be useful in the real world. Is it? How are people using it? Aleksey _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@cfengine.org https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
