tch.*", "pca.*" } ),
>
What's the use case? i.e. do you really think it's better to pass an
anonymous list, instead of giving that list a self-explanatory name?
--
Jerome Baum
tel +49-1578-8434336
email jer...@jeromebaum.com
--
PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA
asically how much "randomness" is available, which is very important for
cryptographic systems -- such as SSL, SSH, and security in cfengine.
You tend to get low entropy on server systems w/out keyboard and mouse to
take entropy from. For further reading
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entr
hen define the class based
on that. If the command is pure (as in "pure function") then it fits in with
promise theory.
Anyhow, this seems like a very academic discussion (which I am absolutely
happy to have!) -- I don't see a practical use, for myself, for the
life-cycle classes.
--
fic reason for this choice or it is arbitrary because
there had to be _some_ choice at all?
--
Jerome Baum
tel +49-1578-8434336
email jer...@jeromebaum.com
--
PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A
PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA
__
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 18:49, Christopher Browne wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:05 PM, wrote:
> > Forum: Cfengine Help
> > Subject: Re: Running a command just once.
> > Author: jeromebaum
> > Link to topic:
> https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,21797,21800#msg-21800
> >
> > All of these on
