On 11/09/12 15:51, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
>
> Implicit iteration over non-local variables was added in 3.3.0.
>
> https://github.com/cfengine/core/blob/3.3.x/ChangeLog
well, that is pretty clear. Thanks for everyones input, I have a
workaround in place until we can upgrade. We are migrating
defined?
G
>
> bundle common g
> {
> vars:
> ...
> }
>
> Meanwhile, there's no need to include common bundles into the bundlesequence.
>
> --
> Best,
> Seva
>
> 2012/9/11 Gregory Matthews:
>> what is wrong here?
>>
>> body
what is wrong here?
body common control
{
bundlesequence => { "g", "test" };
inputs => { "cfengine_stdlib.cf" };
}
bundle agent g
{
vars:
"list" slist => { "1", "2", "3" };
}
bundle agent test
{
reports:
"debug: $(g.list)";
}
results in:
R: debug list: $(g.list)
defining the list lo
> from the template.
>
> --Diego
>
> On Sep 3, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Nick Anderson wrote:
>
>> On 09/03/2012 05:10 AM, Gregory Matthews wrote:
>>>> On 31/08/12 17:30, Diego Zamboni wrote:
>>>>> Greg,
>>>>>
>>>>> You could split the
eate => "true",
edit_defaults => empty,
# this works
edit_line => insert_lines(@(test.eth00)),
comment => "some comment",
classes => if_repaired("some_class");
}
In other words, you /have/ to define the list as a v
G
On 31/08/12 17:30, Diego Zamboni wrote:
> Greg,
>
> You could split the lines into a list, then you can still pass them to
> insert_lines but they will not be indented. Just separate them by
> commas in your code, should work fine.
>
> --Diego
>
> On Aug 31,
how do ppl reconcile indentation for readability in .cf files with the
needs to insert lines that are not indented? for example:
g_dnsserver.my_serv_name::
"/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0-range0"
create => "true",
edit_defaults => empty,
edit_line
On 11/05/12 15:14, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> Is it ever confusing to have two people with the same name? Or two
> anything with the
> same name? :) Same thing with bundles...
except when you need a caffeine boost and you say "Mike, get me a coffee"
I don't care which Mike brings my coffee
On 09/05/12 15:26, Nick Anderson wrote:
> I think you could end up getting some unexpected results if you do that.
>
> If you are referencing a fully qualified variable which one will you get?
>
> My tests show it will vary based on what was defined first. Things could
> get really confusing. It al
Is it bad practice to have bundles with the same name? e.g.
bundle common g {
...
}
bundle agent g {
...
}
it provides some convenience for us and appears to work but am I storing
up trouble for myself?
GREG
--
Greg Matthews01235 778658
Scientific Computing Group Leader
Diamond Light
10 matches
Mail list logo
