Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Problem accessing list variables in hash
Author: nickanderson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,26268,26272#msg-26272
Hi Mike,
I think I would do it in a different way.
You seem to have a user creation bundle already. Perhaps you could consid
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:40:32 -0500 Diego Zamboni wrote:
DZ> Indeed, the version in github.com/cfengine/copbl/ is the master
DZ> copy, from which the others are (sometimes inconsistently)
DZ> updated. We are working on cleaning up some of this to reduce
DZ> confusion.
DZ> Namespace support will
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Problem accessing list variables in hash
Author: zzamboni
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,26268,26270#msg-26270
Hi Mike,
Due to the way variable convergence works in CFEngine, looping over
multi-dimensional arrays doesn't work as one would e
The machine in question was running 3.3.3.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:11 AM, wrote:
> Forum: CFEngine Help
> Subject: Re: 180+ instances of cf-execd and cf-agent
> Author: davidlee
> Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,26261,26266#msg-26266
>
> Sorry, my previous message may hav
I want to have a bundle that creates system user accounts, and adds a
list of authorised ssh keys to those accounts. So, what I have is:-
bundle agent do_config
{
vars:
"users[www-user][gecos]" string => "Web server user";
"users[www-user][home]"string => "/var/lib/www";
"u
Hi Bas,
Indeed, the version in github.com/cfengine/copbl/ is the master copy, from
which the others are (sometimes inconsistently) updated. We are working on
cleaning up some of this to reduce confusion.
Namespace support will help reduce a lot of potential name collisions among
Design Center
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: 180+ instances of cf-execd and cf-agent
Author: davidlee
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,26261,26266#msg-26266
Sorry, my previous message may have confused two distinct things about managing
this:
Assuming 3.1.4 (or thereabouts) with Berkele
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: 180+ instances of cf-execd and cf-agent
Author: davidlee
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,26261,26265#msg-26265
What version of cfengine? This might matter... see below.
Over the last 15 months or so, our cfengine3 installation has grown from
As Mike pointed out NFS is a usual culprit.
--
Sent from my Android phone with probably ridiculous and involuntary spelling
corrections.
Brian Bennett wrote:
Ron,
It looks to me like you have a promise that's getting hung on something. Run
`cf-agent -KIv` (cap k, cap i, little v) and watch t
Ron,
It looks to me like you have a promise that's getting hung on something. Run
`cf-agent -KIv` (cap k, cap i, little v) and watch the output. You should be
able to see where it's hanging.
--
Brian
On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Ron Parker wrote:
> In testing that the promises for a given m
Hey Ron
I have the following in a promise. You may want to adjust the values of
"ago" there. I execute cf-agent once an hour. If I see a cf-agent
process older than 2 hours old, I have the current execution kill that
process and I raise a class that I report on. You could use this same
thing
In testing that the promises for a given machine were sufficient to
reconfigure it from scratch, I did a fresh OS install to a VM,
bootstrapped CFE and manually started cf-agent. After about 30
minutes and the fourth email from the system, it had converged. I
noted a few things that were missing,
On 06/21/2012 02:50 PM, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:46:15 +0200 Bas van der Vlies wrote:
>
> BvdV> Question which cfengine_stdlib.cf to use? Is copbl repository the
> leading one
>
> BvdV> There is one in the copbl and one in the design-center repository and
> they differ:
>
On 06/21/2012 08:21 AM, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> I don't know if the timestamp is necessary, sorry. Try it with the
> timestamp and without it:)
>
> I would have used UTC in an ISO string with the timezone, or simply an
> epoch timestamp. But that's all academic if the file contents don't
> matter.
On 06/21/2012 08:07 AM, Riccardo Murri wrote:
> Hi Ted,
> "cf_promises_validated" seems to contain the date of the last
> successful validation, so maybe this one instead?
I was under the impression that it worked like this.
When policy has changed and then been successfully validated
/var/cfeng
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:07:58 +0200 Riccardo Murri
wrote:
RM> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:17:53 +0200 Riccardo Murri
>> wrote:
>>
RM> Would it be sensible to add a command-line switch to `cf-promises` to
RM> force update of `masterfiles/cf_p
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:39:46 +0200 (CEST) sauer wrote:
n> So, I have a couple of situations where I want to populate an exclude
n> list from an external file. For example, I want to remove the
n> suid/sgid bits from executable files which are group or
n> world-writeable, unless the file is in an
Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:17:53 +0200 Riccardo Murri
> wrote:
>
>RM> Would it be sensible to add a command-line switch to `cf-promises`
>to
>RM> force update of `masterfiles/cf_promises_validated` ?
>
>Would it work to just say "cf-promises ... && touch
>masterfiles/cf_promises
Hi Ted,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:17:53 +0200 Riccardo Murri
> wrote:
>
> RM> Would it be sensible to add a command-line switch to `cf-promises` to
> RM> force update of `masterfiles/cf_promises_validated` ?
>
> Would it work to just say "cf-p
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:59:36 -0500 Ron Parker wrote:
RP> It's not clear to me from the reference manual. If I want to set
RP> permissions on a directory and all of it's descendents that are not
RP> (NFS) mounts, do I want xdev to be true or false?
I think it's similar to the rsync -x flag: if
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:17:53 +0200 Riccardo Murri
wrote:
RM> Would it be sensible to add a command-line switch to `cf-promises` to
RM> force update of `masterfiles/cf_promises_validated` ?
Would it work to just say "cf-promises ... && touch
masterfiles/cf_promises_validated"?
Ted
___
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:46:15 +0200 Bas van der Vlies wrote:
BvdV> Question which cfengine_stdlib.cf to use? Is copbl repository the leading
one
BvdV> There is one in the copbl and one in the design-center repository and
they differ:
I have not updated CFEngine::stdlib in Design Center from t
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Neil Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 01:08:10PM +0200, Mark Burgess wrote:
>>
>> Cf-promises updates this when it executes successfully.
>
> I think that this only happens when called via cf-execd.
>
> ettin:/var/cfengine/masterfiles# rm cf_promise
Hello,
Question which cfengine_stdlib.cf to use? Is copbl repository the leading one
There is one in the copbl and one in the design-center repository and they
differ:
{{{
13:37 install2.lisa.sara.nl:/var/tmp/bas/cfengine
root#
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 46675 Jun 20 09:26 copbl_github/cfengine_std
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 01:08:10PM +0200, Mark Burgess wrote:
>
> Cf-promises updates this when it executes successfully.
I think that this only happens when called via cf-execd.
ettin:/var/cfengine/masterfiles# rm cf_promises_validated
ettin:/var/cfengine/masterfiles# cf-promises
ettin:/var/
Cf-promises updates this when it executes successfully.
--
Sent from my Android phone with probably ridiculous and involuntary spelling
corrections.
Riccardo Murri wrote:
Hello,
I see that the stock `failsafe.cf` bundled with CFEngine Community
updates the input files on the client only when
Hello,
I see that the stock `failsafe.cf` bundled with CFEngine Community
updates the input files on the client only when
`masterfiles/cf_promises_validated` on the server is updated.
I also see that `masterfiles/cf_promises_validated` is periodically
updated on the server by some CFEngine compon
Good day.
CFEngine Community 3.3.4 is now available for download.
Evaluation of policies:
- Fix wrong classes set after installation of several packages
using packages promises (Mantis #829).
- Fix segfault using edit_template on existing file (Mantis #1155).
Misc:
- Fix memory leak during
28 matches
Mail list logo
