On 06/21/2012 02:50 PM, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:46:15 +0200 Bas van der Vlies <b...@sara.nl> wrote: > > BvdV> Question which cfengine_stdlib.cf to use? Is copbl repository the > leading one > > BvdV> There is one in the copbl and one in the design-center repository and > they differ: > > I have not updated CFEngine::stdlib in Design Center from the copbl > repository because the newer stdlib version has service promises, while > Design Center supports 3.2.x, which doesn't have service promises. > > There are very exciting changes coming in 3.4 (see the cfengine core > Github repository, and Mark Burgess tweeted about metadata and > namespaces) so when that's out we're very likely to make it the minimum > required version for Design Center, and to do minor sketch rewrites to > make use of the new functionality. > I have seen and read them ;-). So the copbl will be the leading one. Then i will use this one and forget the others.
Will the metadata or name space solve the problem of multiple includes of copbl library or is this senario impossible with cf-sketch? -- ******************************************************************** * Bas van der Vlies e-mail: b...@sara.nl * * SARA - Academic Computing Services Amsterdam, The Netherlands * ********************************************************************
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@cfengine.org https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
