Hello,
is this a bug in cfengine? I can not see any mistakes...
This is my promise:
bundle agent set_sudoers {
files:
"/etc/sudoers"
create => "true",
perms => mog("0440","root","root"),
edit_line
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Using Variables in insert lines
Author: zzamboni
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24417,24528#msg-24528
As is, the set_config_values() bundle will not work for the case you describe.
For this you could use plain insert_lines: promises as I sho
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Using Variables in insert lines
Author: timw077
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24417,24526#msg-24526
Will this work with multiple lines being the same "setting?"
i.e.for rsyslog, I need a couple of setting, and some seings I want to lo
On 01/09/2012 04:00 PM, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Copy TO Policy Server
Author: sauer
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24515,24524#msg-24524
tjavo87 Wrote:
Is there a disadvantage when all the clients
running the cf-serverd?
You do want
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Copy TO Policy Server
Author: sauer
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24515,24524#msg-24524
tjavo87 Wrote:
> Is there a disadvantage when all the clients
> running the cf-serverd?
You do want to keep in mind that cf-serverd (and everything else
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Using dist for random selections
Author: sauer
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24500,24523#msg-24523
It seems like perhaps using a persistent class and a transient class in
combination would be an acceptable (perhaps even preferable) alternat
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Review request for a new book on CF Engine (free copy)
Author: jiteshg
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24521,24521#msg-24521
Hi,
I'm Jitesh, and I work for Packt Publishing.
We are currently looking for people who'd be interested in reviewing o
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: CFEngine Help: Re: Copy TO Policy Server
Author: tjavo87
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24520,24522#msg-24522
Bas van der Vlies Wrote:
---
> On 01/09/2012 10:44 AM, no-re...@cfengine.com
> w
On 01/09/2012 10:44 AM, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Copy TO Policy Server
Author: tjavo87
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24515,24517#msg-24517
mark Wrote:
---
Same approach, just revers
On Thursday 05 January 2012 07:23:33 you wrote:
> While I don't know if it's possible to negate an existing class, if what
> you're trying to do is force cfengine to unconditionally use apt-get
> rather than aptitude, then you could copy the "body package_method apt"
> promise from the stdlib, a
Hi Diego, thanks for response.
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 17:37:03 Diego Zamboni wrote:
> To unconditionally undefined a class (which is what -N does) you could
> define it as an expression that always evaluates to false:
>
> classes:
> "class_to_undefine" not => "any";
I tried that, both w
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Copy TO Policy Server
Author: tjavo87
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24515,24517#msg-24517
mark Wrote:
---
> Same approach, just reverse the names in the
> previous example.
>
> This presu
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Copy TO Policy Server
Author: mark
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24515,24516#msg-24516
Same approach, just reverse the names in the previous example.
This presumes that you run the cf-serverd process on every host. Everything in
cfengine
13 matches
Mail list logo
